Search results

  1. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    We wish to ask for 72 hour extension for discovery , I was busy during the week and i lost one of my lawiers that was solving the cases during the week.
  2. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. v__d [2025] SCR 7

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. V__D (Mezimoří representing) Defendant I. PLEA The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on the charge of Corruption. The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY on Nine charges counts of Incitement. The...
  3. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, Throughout this proceeding, the plaintiff has failed to meet the fundamental burden of proof required in civil cases. While attempting to secure a substantial judgment of $65,000, the plaintiff has presented only...
  4. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Breach of Procedure Responses to responses are not permitted.
  5. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, the defense apologizes for the confusion. The defense concurs that the use of the word "in-game" is a mischaracterization of what actually happened, and consents to that word being struck or amended from the answer to complaint. Nevertheless, the defense's...
  6. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, the defense apologizes for the confusion. The defense concurs that the use of the word "in-game" is a mischaracterization of what actually happened, and consents to that word being struck or amended from the answer to complaint. Nevertheless, the defense's...
  7. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Vanguard & Co Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 1 of the complaint regarding the Plaintiff and Defendant. 2. The Defendant DENIES the general allegations...
  8. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Your Honor, I respectfully request a 24-hour extension. I got confused by active motion and Amicus Briefs and assumed deadline is standart 72 hours not 48 hours. We will post answer to complaint ASAP
  9. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Clearly, he was not deported when you wrote the objection making this a Perjury.
  10. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Perjury Your Honor, opposing counsel has knowingly misrepresented the facts under oath by falsely claiming that Mr. Naez is deported. This is demonstrably untrue, and I am submitting evidence confirming that my client remains in the country. We move to strike this false assertion from the...
  11. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Breach of Procedure Your Honor, the defendant is not deported. Moreover, the purpose of an amicus brief is to offer the Court impartial analysis from interested third parties regarding the facts and legal claims at issue. Instead, the author has chosen to focus on court procedure and advocate...
  12. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant respectfully moves this Court to dismiss under Rule 5.5 I. FAILURE TO FOLLOW CONTRACTUAL REMEDIES Exhibit P-020 (Vanguard Market Access TOS) explicitly provides the procedure for addressing alleged exploitative trades: "Customers are strictly prohibited from...
  13. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    I will be representing naez in this case. We are now present.
  14. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    1) How many pieces of evidence does each murder leave behind ?
  15. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Motion to Reconsider It is disappointing that the Court did not provide its reasoning for overruling the hearsay objection, but nonetheless I will assume it is due to the plaintiff counsel’s response. Unfortunately, an out of court statement is an out of court statement no matter who said it...
  16. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Speculation The witness answered with “it appears so” which has an element of uncertainty associated with it. The answer is speculative and must be struck.
  17. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Hearsay Your honor, the request calls for hearsay. Regardless of whether or not the witness made the statements, the statements are still out of court and are not admissible. The staff team can answer questions about content in court, but they can't answer questions about conversations that...
  18. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Breach of Procedure I provided a response under permission of the Court, and the plaintiff is not entitled to give further response without permission. I therefore move to strike.
  19. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Each piece of evidence must be labeled per the court rules. Two pieces of evidence were provided under one label. Two pieces of evidence constitutes two labels. Otherwise, what stops someone from submitting their entire evidence portfolio as P-001 ? The point is so that we can easily refer to...
  20. Vernicia

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Motion to Dismiss Anticipating the fact that neither Dartanman nor Savannah will be able to prove with certainty they were barristers when they posted the complaint or any of the following necessary elements of the case, and that those would therefore be struck, the plaintiff is left without a...
Back
Top