Search results

Your honor: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER In light of closed court filings, and above amendments, I do believe that both of these individuals may provide relevant testimony in closed court. However, if this is not granted, I ask that you consider the...

Your honor: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND Consistent with Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), which states: As we are still in discovery at the time of this filing, the Plaintiff hereby amends the complaint as follows: Parties We add the following...

Your honor: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE It appears that Plura's post has been summarily deleted after this motion was filed, instead of being marked as stricken. So that I don't look crazy, for posterity's sake, I move to withdraw the aforementioned...

Your honor: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE As the Plaintiff has previously noted in this case, and as the Commonwealth is well aware, Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories) states that "[r]equests for Interrogatories must be made 72 hours prior to the...

Seeing as Your Honor has sustained objections to interrogatories 3-5: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Plaintiff seeks to amend Interrogatories 3-5 to read as follows: 3. Yes or no: Is the Department of Commerce, under the laws of the Commonwealth of...

Your honor, IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Plaintiff doesn't quite understand the Court's method for coming to the conclusion that the two would give similar testimony. Dearev is presently leading the RBI, while Stoppers is on the FRB; the two...

Your honor, IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Defendant Naezaratheus is permanently deported (see: Evidence P-001). As the Supreme Court noted in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2, "Deported players have no rights in our nation and have no rights to...

Your honor, Following a clarification from senior staff during the filing of this case and not noticed until after the filing of this case, the Plaintiff moves as follows: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint and...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION lucaaasserole (Mezimoří Legal Department - MZLD representing) Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus and DangerNoodle2570 Defendants COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF...

Your honor, Plaintiff humbly requests that Plaintiff be permitted to respond to this motion and be given 24 hours to do so. Plaintiff also notes that the recent flurry of activity over the past half-day has created a good amount of work for the judiciary, and, to give all of us a slight bit...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, According to the Objections Guide, a "relevance" objection is permitted "when evidence presented is not relevant to the case, or a witness is asked an irrelevant question". Because a witness list does not...

Your honor, IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND Consistent with Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff asks that the above witness list be amended to read as follows: Gnomewhisperer Avaneesh2008 xSyncx Juniperfig 1950minecrafter Freeze_Line Dearev...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE Your honor, I had anticipated replies to objections taking longer than actually was required. As such, I ask that you please consider this request be stricken as moot.

Your honor, The fifth interrogatory question does not ask "if the event had happened AND if information had been obtained" (emphasis mine). In fact, the question does not use the term "and" once, nor any other sort of conjunctive language tying multiple questions together; the Commonwealth's...

Your honor, the question is very simple. We are asking if the Commonwealth or its agents reached out to Volt and did obtain information regarding the existence of GnomeWhisperer's account there. If it the case that the Commonwealth or its agents did both, they can truthfully answer in the...

Question 3 is relevant to the case, and asks a factual question of law of the Commonwealth. This is not an opinion - either the laws of the Commonwealth consider this a seizure or they do not. Moreover, this question is obviously related to fact No. 7, which was denied by the Commonwealth in...

We are asking, simply, whether the Commonwealth holds that "it was truly necessary that Volt be frozen during the period of the so-called 'bank holiday' in order to stabilize the economy and financial sector". This is not an opinion - either Volt being frozen was required to stabilize the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Under Rule 6.3 (Objections), "Objections to questions and arguments are actionable under the methods provided within the thread “Guide” Objection Guide". The relevant thread states: As should be clear "FORM...

Your honor, may I take time to reply to these objections?

Your honor: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES Pursuant to Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories), the Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories which the Defendant must answer truthfully and to the best of their ability: Yes or no: Prior to the...