Your honor we are not pursuing Tortious Interference with Contract which is what you linked we are pursuing
Tortious Interference with Business Relations.
Which is the following
According to Rule 3.3 of the Court Rules & Procedures the plaintiff would like to ammend the complaint in light of the Department of Commerce approving the corporations this afternnon, the ammendment will be as follows.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RiggoSoft
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Commerce
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follows
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM PLAINTIFF
I. Parties
1. RiggoSoft
2. Department of Commerce
II. Facts
1. On July 24th 2026, the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RiggoSoft
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Commerce
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follows
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM PLAINTIFF
I. Parties
1. RiggoSoft
2. Department of Commerce
II. Facts
1. On July 24th 2026, the...
No your honor I don’t understand cause the claim that ftlceo is a citizen is stupid. His passport and legal documents never mentions FTLCEO. If I made my instagram handle John Kennedy that doesn’t make me John Kennedy. FTLCEO wasn’t a citizen and never has been the discord account FTLCEO was...
I will be appealing the rulings of this motion to a higher court. Additionally your honor for future reference am I allowed to go by an alias if we are setting that precedent and or can I go by discord username/nickname?
Your honor respectfully thats not what you approved on. You approved the plaintiff's request to "modify" not add. You had already ruled on this. Additionally now that you have overruled the objection we would like to respond to the motion to dismiss.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
Objection - Breach of Procedure
The defense has violated the court procedures for the process of submitting a motion to dismiss. According to rule 5.1 of the Court Rules and Procedures.
The defense has not listed any rule that they are filing the motion under...
Ok thank you sorry that’s so weird. I’ll reupload them with my response and then if that doesn’t work we may need to contact staff cause I can see them fine on my end
Your honor this motion to compel from the counter-plaintiff is extremely nonsenseical and an invasion of my privacy, but beyond that there is other reasons why this laughable motion should be denied for all requests.
1) The counter-plaintiff's has requested for all communications between myself...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.