Search results

Understood, in future note that there is no need for you to list any of the Plaintiff's evidence in your answer to complaint, you need only reference it if you so choose. Now, discovery shall open for 5 days starting from this message.

Struck after noticing a deficiency. @Im_Wolffyy, where is your evidence? It has not been attacked to your answer to complaint.

Discovery is now open, and will remain open for the next 5 days, starting from this message.

@greymc shall serve as lead council for this case going forward.

Please present your answer to complaint within 48 hours.

@schmuck is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER- WARNING Defendant .SteelBirch6844 is hereby warned to not attempt to communicate with the Presiding Officer about this case in any manner outside of this court thread. Rule 1.4.1.1, a standing order of the courts, explicitly states...

I will now be your presiding officer. Discovery has ended. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL After a cursory review of the case, it has been found that the Plaintiff's case has failed to sufficiently establish standing for some of their Claims...

@.SteelBirch6844 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of amah853 v. SteelBirch6844 [2026] DCR 174.

This complaint must be amended in line with the proper template listed in Guide - Templates in order to comply with Rule 3.1. Please put the written statement inside a quote box, properly number your facts, and put all long quotes into quote boxes, as well.

@Devious355 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of edwardcul1en v. Devious355 [2026] DCR 173.

@Matthew100x (or any other individual authorized to represent the Commonwealth) is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of rotcepsnI & Budgiebud v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 85.

Discovery is now open for the next 7 days, starting from this message.

I will now be the presiding officer on this case. This motion to dismiss is DENIED. As the Plaintiff stated correctly, Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim) requires that it be filed "after the end of discovery." Regardless of the evidence currently presented, discovery will allow for additional evidence to...

Given that Former Judge Dartanboy is no longer on the bench, I shall now preside over this case. I will take this as an objection. Overruled. Rule 3.3 explicitly allows for the amendments to be made to Complaints which change the Claims for Relief. That this sort of change is allowed is clear...

Please hyperlink all sources in line with Rule 1.10, and correct your citation mistakes (for example, I am unaware of a subpart III of the RCCA). Summons shall not be issued until this is corrected.

I will be your presiding officer. Given that the UJP has been dissolved (https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/united-justice-party.38283/#post-172345), the Court asks that the Plaintiff make the changes mentioned in this post.

I will now be taking on this case following the resignation of the Honorable Former Judge ko531. Motion denied. The Prosecution's evidence shows the date on which wanted points were created, and as such it seems at the very least probable that the evidence was recorded before February 8th, 2026...

@Citrixxxx @lao19 do you still wish to pursue this case? You have 48 hours to respond.

@Kenadian do you still wish to pursue this case? You have 48 hours to respond.