IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:
P-010: In-game chat logs dated June 12, 2026,
showing the Plaintiff logging into the server
at 23:45:30 and actively present in-game at
23:57:54 and 23:58:23...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:
P-008: In-game chat log dated June 12, 2026,
at 21:45:50, showing DHS Recruit CreeperTD
directing the Plaintiff to open a DHS support
ticket under #support...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WITNESS LIST
(Pursuant to Court Rule 4.9)
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff submits the following witness list:
1. MMiqa — The Plaintiff will testify regarding the repeated and explicit invocations of §6(b) during imprisonment, DHS's repeated...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories to the Defendant:
Interrogatory 1: At what point were Robbe Haegi and Vuda Sage respectively aware of the Plaintiff's self-defence claim under...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER
Your Honour,
Pursuant to the Court's order, the Plaintiff provides the following direct answer to the Defendant's third interrogatory:
Interrogatory 3: What is the difference between the words "submission" and...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION
(Pursuant to Court Rule 4.6)
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:
P-007: Full transcript of Ticket #32935, submitted pursuant to the Court's order on the Defendant's Motion to Compel.
The...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS
Your Honour,
I. Response to Perjury/Non-Responsive Objection
There is no contradiction and no perjury. The Plaintiff's statements are entirely consistent.
The Complaint states Vuda Sage was "typing and deleting...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff responds to the Defendant's interrogatories as follows:
Interrogatory 1: Where does the "management time zones" explanation appear?
The "management time zones" explanation was made by...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion to Compel in its entirety.
I. Ticket #32935 is in Defendant's own possession
Ticket #32935 is a Department of Homeland Security support...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Your Honour,
The Plaintiff does not contest the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with respect to the first prayer for relief. The Plaintiff accepts that nominal damages are not available where other damages are...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND EVIDENCE CAPTION — P-002
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff moves to amend the caption of P-002 to accurately reflect its contents.
Current caption: "Screenshot showing the Defendant rykazard has initiated a fight ('rykazard has...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2:
P-013: Enhanced screenshots of the Plaintiff's farm — showing the full scale of the farming operation...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Your Honor,
P-012: Enhanced ticket screenshot with staff response.
DATED: This 16th day of June, 2026
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-005
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-005.
P-005 and P-006 are not duplicates — they capture two entirely distinct moments. P-005 shows the moment of impact — the Plaintiff...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY FINDING
Your Honor,
The Defendant claims the Plaintiff "simply chose" to stop fishing and that the Defendant's conduct had nothing to do with this decision. This is directly contradicted by the evidence on record.
P-008 confirms...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-009
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-009.
P-009 is a screenshot of a Discord support ticket opened by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is the author of the ticket and can...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-001 AND P-002
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-001 and P-002.
P-001, P-002, and P-003 are not duplicates. Each screenshot captures a distinct moment in a continuous...
Your Honor, the Plaintiff notes that the Defendant has filed an Objection during the discovery period. Objections are not a recognised procedural step during discovery. If the Defendant wishes to challenge the admissibility of P-008, the appropriate mechanism is a Motion to Strike. The Plaintiff...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY FINDING
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff confirms the renaming of the playtime screenshot from P-005 to P-007 as suggested by the Defendant. This is noted for the record.
The Plaintiff also wishes to clarify the nature of the Loss of...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2:
P-008: Discord screenshots from both Democracycraft and Multiman/Jada campaign discord confirming that...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.