Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-010: In-game chat logs dated June 12, 2026, showing the Plaintiff logging into the server at 23:45:30 and actively present in-game at 23:57:54 and 23:58:23...
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-008: In-game chat log dated June 12, 2026, at 21:45:50, showing DHS Recruit CreeperTD directing the Plaintiff to open a DHS support ticket under #support...
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS LIST (Pursuant to Court Rule 4.9) Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. MMiqa — The Plaintiff will testify regarding the repeated and explicit invocations of §6(b) during imprisonment, DHS's repeated...
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories to the Defendant: Interrogatory 1: At what point were Robbe Haegi and Vuda Sage respectively aware of the Plaintiff's self-defence claim under...
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER Your Honour, Pursuant to the Court's order, the Plaintiff provides the following direct answer to the Defendant's third interrogatory: Interrogatory 3: What is the difference between the words "submission" and...
  6. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION (Pursuant to Court Rule 4.6) Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-007: Full transcript of Ticket #32935, submitted pursuant to the Court's order on the Defendant's Motion to Compel. The...
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS Your Honour, I. Response to Perjury/Non-Responsive Objection There is no contradiction and no perjury. The Plaintiff's statements are entirely consistent. The Complaint states Vuda Sage was "typing and deleting...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES Your Honour, The Plaintiff responds to the Defendant's interrogatories as follows: Interrogatory 1: Where does the "management time zones" explanation appear? The "management time zones" explanation was made by...
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion to Compel in its entirety. I. Ticket #32935 is in Defendant's own possession Ticket #32935 is a Department of Homeland Security support...
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, The Plaintiff does not contest the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with respect to the first prayer for relief. The Plaintiff accepts that nominal damages are not available where other damages are...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND EVIDENCE CAPTION — P-002 Your Honor, The Plaintiff moves to amend the caption of P-002 to accurately reflect its contents. Current caption: "Screenshot showing the Defendant rykazard has initiated a fight ('rykazard has...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-013: Enhanced screenshots of the Plaintiff's farm — showing the full scale of the farming operation...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, P-012: Enhanced ticket screenshot with staff response. DATED: This 16th day of June, 2026
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-005 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-005. P-005 and P-006 are not duplicates — they capture two entirely distinct moments. P-005 shows the moment of impact — the Plaintiff...
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Defendant claims the Plaintiff "simply chose" to stop fishing and that the Defendant's conduct had nothing to do with this decision. This is directly contradicted by the evidence on record. P-008 confirms...
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-009 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-009. P-009 is a screenshot of a Discord support ticket opened by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is the author of the ticket and can...
  17. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-001 AND P-002 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-001 and P-002. P-001, P-002, and P-003 are not duplicates. Each screenshot captures a distinct moment in a continuous...
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honor, the Plaintiff notes that the Defendant has filed an Objection during the discovery period. Objections are not a recognised procedural step during discovery. If the Defendant wishes to challenge the admissibility of P-008, the appropriate mechanism is a Motion to Strike. The Plaintiff...
  19. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Plaintiff confirms the renaming of the playtime screenshot from P-005 to P-007 as suggested by the Defendant. This is noted for the record. The Plaintiff also wishes to clarify the nature of the Loss of...
  20. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-008: Discord screenshots from both Democracycraft and Multiman/Jada campaign discord confirming that...
Back
Top