Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. I. THE CITED PRECEDENTS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS CASE AND ARE NOT BINDING The Defendant...
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honor, I did not mean to disrespect, I just wanted to point out that this was happening for the second time.
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT NOTICE TO COURT Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to two matters arising from Robbe Haegi's most recent filing. First, regarding procedure: this Court has already ruled that a witness may not challenge...
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — PERJURY Your Honour, Robbe Haegi has now stated before this Court on multiple occasions that they never made the statement cited by the Plaintiff. This is the second time Robbe Haegi has made this denial in these proceedings...
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that under Court Rules and Procedures, a party may respond to an objection within 24 hours of it being filed. The Plaintiff is exercising that right. The Defendant's...
  6. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 2 asked Robbe Haegi to identify the specific provision of the Criminal Code Act, the Executive Standards Act, or any other statute or DHS policy document that authorised the statement made at...
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO ALL PENDING FILINGS Your Honour, Before responding to the pending filings, the Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to the following: The Defendant, rykazard, has failed to participate in these proceedings at...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is procedurally improper. Court Rules require that a Motion to Dismiss be submitted before the beginning of opening statements. The Plaintiff's opening statement was filed. This Motion was filed — well after...
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    @Muggy21 Your Honor, The Plaintiff would like to respectfully point out that @Vudaaa has failed to respond in time.
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, The Plaintiff acknowledges Robbe Haegi's apology and considers the matter of decorum closed. On the question of witness objections, the Plaintiff defers to the Court's judgment on whether a witness has standing to lodge...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to two matters arising from Robbe Haegi's most recent filing. First, Robbe Haegi has confirmed that they are not representing the Commonwealth in this case. As a witness...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Robbe Haegi's objection addresses Questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 but does not provide substantive answers to any of them. Robbe Haegi instead challenges the framing of the questions and...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION — COUNSEL IS TESTIFYING / ASKED AND ANSWERED Your Honour, I. Counsel is Testifying The Plaintiff's questions reference §6(b) and DHS's own interrogatory response, both of which are established parts of the record...
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 2 asked Robbe Haegi to identify the specific provision of the Criminal Code Act, the Executive Standards Act, or any other statute or DHS policy document that authorised the statement made at...
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following questions for witnesses: I. MMiqa — Narrative On June 12, 2026, I was arrested and charged with Mass Murder x7. Upon arrest, DHS Recruit CreeperTD directed me to open a DHS...
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    @Dartanboy Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully wishes to draw the Court's attention to the pending the Public Defender Program has failed the 10 day deadline. It has been 18 days since it was in place. We understand that there is a workload in the DoJ, for that reason the Plaintiff...
  17. MMiqa

    Election Council Elections - JULY 2026 (Special #1)

    I, MMiqa, declare that I will be contesting a seat on the Council of Oakridge as an Independent.
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RemyTheRatta v. Bernerd_madoff [2026] DCR 134

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION RemyTheRatta (represented by SingeHeart, Addams & Associates) Plaintiff v. Bernerd_madoff Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES RemyTheRatta (Plaintiff), a...
  19. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    @Dogeington Your Honor, It has been 8 days since all parties confirmed their presence in response to the Writ of Summons. Respectfully requesting the Court's guidance on how it wishes to proceed at this stage. MMiqa Plaintiff
Back
Top