Search results

Answer to Objection As stated in the Guide - OBJECTIONS, I am using my right to answer to Objection without asking permission. One of the objections is about the claim "abstain" is not counted towards the vote. This may exist in Legislative Standards Act, but not in Bar Association of Redmont...

May I respond, Your Honor

OBJECTION - PERJURY The word "abstain" itself does not exist in the Bar Association of Redmont Act. The Defendant must be confusing with the Act with Legislative Standards Act. With 2 aye, 1 abstain and 1 against vote does not fulfill majority vote where there were 5 sitting council members...

OBJECTION - PERJURY There were 5 sitting Councillors in the time of Motion to Censure MMiqa, as also confirmed by the Defendant. The voting was 2 aye, 1 against and 1 abstain. This does not fulfill the Bar Association of Redmont Act, Part V 4(c), that "A majority vote of the Council in favour...

OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honor, in the Bar Assocation of Redmont Act, it is not defined that abstain means that their vote will count towards the quorum, but not count as either an Aye or a Nay. In the stated Act, there are no mention to "abstain" as a vote, it just states in Part IV 2(2)...

Your Honor, The Defendant is answering a motion to strike without asking permission from the Judge.

OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's request to toll the Answer deadline until rulings on the Motion to Dismiss and all objections. No provision of the Court Rules and Procedures tolls or suspends the Answer deadline pending a Motion to Dismiss...

Response to Objection As stated before, in the case of a file is wrongfull opened in a different court, Judge can easily move this case to District Court. If The Judge sees it fit, The Plaintiff would like to make the changes as the Court requires.

Response to Objection The Plaintiff showed the mistake the Defendant made, and filed for Breach of Procedure he could have filed for a perjury, if the Defendant wishes. This is a sign of good faith that he wishes not to punish people for basic human mistakes the Defendant did, if the Defendant...

Response to Objection The Plaintiff ask that how with 5 sitting councillors, a motion to censure passed with 2 aye votes. If the Defendant has no answer to this claim factually, rather than answering with amended laws from different Acts and making up claims the Plaintiff wishes to continue...

OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Defense's own precedent, MJL_ v. LegoMasterW472 [2026] DCR 118, actually supports the Plaintiff's position. In that case, evidence was submitted through a properly filed Answer to Complaint, which Rule 4 permits. The Defense here has not filed an Answer at...

Response to Objection The Plaintiff wishes to send the full, uncut version of the section: FEDERAL COURT JURISIDICTION The‌ ‌Federal Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Redmont‌ ‌hears‌ ‌all‌ ‌major‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance, presided over by a Judge. ‌If you are unsure as to...

Motion to Strike The Defendant is not permitted to send evidence before Discovery, The Plaintiff wishes to see the parts that refers to the "evidences" struck from record. Evidence is shown here in Court Proceedings.

Response to Motion to Dismiss As The Plaintiff stated before, without FACT II, Fact I is easily the proof that this was done improperly. With 5 sitting council members, only 2 votes were casted "aye", this is not simple majority, even if we don't count abstain, which we shouldn't do, but for...

Response to Objection The Defendant cannot submit evidence before discovery, especially before we see answer to complaint from the Defendant. I am requesting Judge Superwoops to strike these evidences. It is a shame that Spokesperson of BAR does not know this fact. The Plaintiff wishes not to...

Username: MMiqa I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69 Basis for Appeal: I. THE GOVERNING STANDARD The Criminal Code Act (restored), Part I, Section 5...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION I have amended the first filing before a Judge took over the case, if needed, I request permission from Judge @Superwoops to post it again in this post.

Motion To Reconsider For the Term "Judge shopping", it first arised in the server forum from rykazard case couple days ago by AmityBlamity, where Superwoops was the Judge, which at this point after informed by the Judge no longer wishes to strike it out, the Plaintiff wishes to explain the...

Motion To Strike No Your Honour, if you looked at the Appeals, I already filed an appeal, so respectfully, I would not ask it from you here. This is not the place, The Plaintiff would like to continue defend this point but he was warned that this was not a conversation so he wishes to strike...

For now, Plaintiff wishes to continue. But Judge @ko531 misses a point, I can get another lawyer to take my case. The Plaintiff talked out of order, received a strike, 60 penalty units and 5 minutes of jail. In this case, Ebborsnam, not a party to this case, talked jibberish and openly...