Search results

Response to Objection Editing the Evidences, sorry Your Honor, its very late for me and I have made this mistake because of it.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Your Honour, This Court should not find the Plaintiff guilty of Ex Parte Communication because the elements of that offence are not met, on multiple independent grounds. First, the Plaintiff's message was not...

Response to Objection Your Honor, I wish not to repeat myself here, I have given my answer in the post #117, that in my mind I had the educated guess that CreeperTD voted Aye, but since I had no proof, I left that ambiguous in the court filing, as I said in my response before. The Plaintiff...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Defense's Motion to Reconsider describes the Plaintiff's disclosed uncertainty as: This is not legal argument. It is a personal, insulting characterization of the Plaintiff, unsupported by...

Yes, in part. In my mind I thought CreeperTD voted Aye, but at the time of filing I had no proof, so I left it ambiguous on purpose. I made an educated guess but never explicitly stated what CreeperTD’s vote was while filing this lawsuit. When I filed the Complaint, BAR had not disclosed how...

Response to Objection Your Honor, The Defense’s own filing states: “the BAR is being represented by myself, Chairperson CreeperTD.” Having admitted he represents the Defendant, CreeperTD cannot claim it is perjury to be addressed as the Defendant. Every question the Plaintiff asked concerns...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Defendant has stated: 1-) The Plaintiff has submitted the bill's link and gave reasons why that bill is relevant in their first response to objection. 2-) For this, the Plaintiff has given the answer, that is here: 3-) The answer is the same, rule...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF WITNESS LIST Your Honor, Pursuant to Rule 4.9, the Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. CreeperTD 2. OwnedBlock 3. xVoltrix 4. asexualdinosaur These people were the Councillors that have voted on the Motion to...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION The Plaintiff wishes to clear the confusion. The Defendant is here to represent the BAR and is the Chairperson of the BAR. For question 2, the Defendant and also the Chairperson of the BAR co-authored an Act, an Act they quoted here when it was not passed. Other members of...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY EVIDENCE Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence into the record: P-001 — BAR Rendition Act, co-authored by BAR Chairperson CreeperTD and Representative _GreyMC, introduced in Congress on August 11...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories to the Defendant: 1. On August 11, 2026, two days after this lawsuit was filed, did you co-author, with Representative _GreyMC, a bill titled the...

1914

Your Honor, I retract my message that I sent here: The Plaintiff wishes to clearify it, since the Defendant has cleared the confusion of the title and it was changed, and this is no longer seen as a new motion, and it is now clear that it is the the Defendant's response. The Plaintiff saw the...

Your Honor, the Plaintiff respectfully requests a permission to reply to this motion.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Defendant's own response, currently on the record, contains argumentative language starting from the first sentece of their response, including the following statements: These are not...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, The Defense's argument does not support its position. First, the Defense stated that 'The assertion that one cannot vote abstain on a motion because abstain isn't mentioned in the law is absurd' but the...

Edit: The Plaintiff wishes to apologize, he has not seen the Defendant replying to the Plaintiff's objection, since they have not stated in their response as "Answer/Response to Objection". They wish not to disrupt the Court and withdraws this objection.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Defendant has spoken out of turn, therefore the Plaintiff requests their response to be struck from the record.

Response to Objection The Plaintiff used his right to response to objection that was stated in Guide - Objections: "The opposing party may answer the objection within 24 HOURS. The opposing party may answer to the objection without asking for permission from the presiding Judge." The...

Response to Objection The Plaintiff already gave proof that they can response the objection. As stated in the Guide: "The opposing party may answer the objection within 24 HOURS. The opposing party may answer to the objection without asking for permission from the presiding Judge."...