Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Justice Compass, Ltd. v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 98

    Denied. If only so that the record is preserved for the ongoing trial of Judge xtub in the Senate if needed. I will make it so it is a spoiler that needs to be expanded however. Also I will make the support ticket in the next few hours so we can setup an in-game trial.
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Anthony_Org v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 117

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT DISMISSAL The Court is dismissing this case on the following grounds: 1. Standing - Even though the Plaintiff is a member of the Senate, they still lack standing. No harm was done to them personally, and if there was indeed harm, it would be to the Congress as...
  3. ameslap

    Expungement: Granted Aboundedcomet - Expungement Request

    The Court will grant this expungement and direct the DHS to do the thing. We are now adjourned. Thank you.
  4. ameslap

    Expungement: Granted Aboundedcomet - Expungement Request

    @Kaiserin_ is required to appear before the federal Court in the case of Aboundedcomet Expungement. When you arrive, please post a response of approval or denial for the expungement.
  5. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    This Court accepts the terms of the settlement and orders the following: Fines MysticPhunky $8,000 in legal fees, unfines $8,000 to BrownBerry for legal fees. This case is now dismissed with prejudice inline with the provisions of the agreement. Court is now adjourned, thank you for your time.
  6. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. urb5n [2025] FCR 83

    You can have the 48 hours that was first established when I restarted proceedings. If you need additional time, please let me know prior to it expiring.
  7. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Per the Appeal to the FCR, this case is being sent back to the DCR with instructions.
  8. ameslap

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] DCR 87 - Appeal

    This Court will be accepting this Appeal in part. This matter will be sent back to the District Court to re-examine the facts and merits. As far as the Reverse Class Action goes, there has been multiple throughout Redmont's history that establish the best course of action. 1. The same entity...
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Justice Compass, Ltd. v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 98

    @Dartanboy @asexualdinosaur I have taken over this case. Discovery concluded LONG AGO but I will reopen it for the next 48 hours just to make sure we are good. Also within the next 48 hours both parties need to respond on if they would like an in-game trial or not. Failure to respond to this...
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned 12700k v jb4bass [2025] FCR 93

    Denied. This is a warning to not miss any more deadlines by the Public Defender. Denied. Here is what I will do given this case has been a cluster from the start. The Public Defender Program has 48 to decide the assignment of this case and to amend their answer to the complaint given new...
  11. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. urb5n [2025] FCR 83

    Hello all, I have taken over this case. I ask that all parties please do the following within the next 48 hours: Confirm who the attorneys are on this case for both the Commonwealth and the Defense. Provide a brief of any outstanding items or relevant information that will help me get this case...
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    Granted. @BrownBerry @MysticPhunky please join the judiciary discord within the next 24 hours and ping me when you arrive so I can set up the sidebar.
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    Counsel, I believe you are putting your own interpretation of the Claims for Relief in place of what is written. The exact quote is: You can argue that the Claim is invalid with supporting evidence that is brought through discovery all you wish. I will not change my mind on this motion at this...
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    Motion Denied. The exact quote from the rules: I believe that counsel is confusing a Claim for Relief and a Prayer for Relief. The claims are listed (albeit without citing a specific violation of the law). Allow me to inform Counsels what is what: Claim for Relief: Why facts rise to a claim...
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    The Plaintiff may be accepting this settlement, but this Court does not and will be rejecting this settlement agreement. The Court will use a multiple-prong test to determine if a settlement agreement is valid, these tests include: Ambiguity or Vagueness: Settlements must be clear and...
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    The Defense has 48 to file their answer to the complaint.
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MysticPhunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 115

    @Culls is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Mysticphunky v. Culls [2025] FCR 114
  18. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned 12700k v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 89

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT 12700k v. MattTheSavvy - [2025] FCR 89 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Defendant breached their contract. The Defense failed to contest any facts or provide any evidence. II. DEFENDANT’S POSITION “I think… thank you”...
  19. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Yeet_Boy v. The Department of Public Affairs [2025] FCR 90

    Objection Sustained In Part. The Plaintiff (@zLost) is ordered to split these images into separate ones so they can be addressed individually. An example would be creating exhibits such as P-001A, P-001B, etc. This allows the court to know that they are connected but not the same and easily...
Back
Top