Search results

A public defender will be issued for the defense shortly

Granted

Once all 3 witnesses are present the defense may begin questioning them

@Freeze_Line @EpicFought and @Mask3D_WOLF are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Epicfought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19.

@StaleUmbrella80 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Realimza v. Staleumbrella80 [2025] DCR 24

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Dartanboy v. Bepus [2025] DCR 22. I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The defendant slandered Dart by making a false statement accusing him of a murder he did not commit. 2. Someone took this false statement to be true cause Dart reputational harm...

Granted

The defense has 72 hours to post their opening statements

Sorry for the late response, even though opening statements already was posted this would have been granted anyways This motion and the motion to submit late evidence is denied. For one it was submitted after discover and late but also this policy doesnt serve mainly as a employee policy but as...

Granted. Case in recess pending verdict

Granted. Case Dismissed

Granted

Yes as they clearly expressed that they cant comply as they do not have access to it.

The Plaintiff now has 72 hours to provide their opening statements

Overruled I do not see enough of an intent to lie, You asked for the employee policy while just before providing a screenshot from their code of conduct. They could not find the edit log for the Code of Conduct which is exactly what they said. Sustained. The DOJ Policy Handbook will be struck.

@Plura72 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Argen_lee v Plura71 [2025] DCR 20

@Bepus is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Dartanboy v Bepus [2025] DCR 22

you may

I am granting this motion to compel. The DOJ is required, to the best of their ability, to provide either the employee policy from the time Epicfought was fired or provide evidence showing what exactly was edited between then and now.

Sustained, I'm going to delete the message as it's just the letter P and has no value in the case or in the court record.