Search results

I am aware of the right to a speedy trial and this case so far has gone without unnecessary delay. Your right to a speedy trial does not trump the defendants right to representation. The delay we may be experiencing is necessary to assure all rights of all parties are protected.

I am dismissing this case but because I am a listed party and this could be seen as Bias, I will directly show the facts (and not interpretation) that forces this decision. Firstly, this case was filed in the wrong court. Because this case is seeking "the removal of all defendents from office"...

The plaintiff may cross examine the witnesses. Please either ask your questions or inform the court if you have no questions in the next 72 hours

Motion for Summary Judgement denied. A Public Defender will be called to represent the defendant

Overruled. The question was about how mask3d came to a conclusion. Mask3d is just explaining what they thought that brought them there.

@wttn2c is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of 15fine v. wttn2c [2025] DCR 32

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MrCheesguy (formerly siebelol7) v. Forevershadow1 [2025] DCR 15. I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The defendant trespassed onto the plaintiff's property, harassed and killed them 2. The resulting blood splatter from the murders caused a loss of...

We will now be entering discovery, discovery will last 72 hours starting now

I have taken over this case and a public defender has been requested. No summary judgement will happen

I have just taken over this case given the previous presiding officer is no longer able to continue, I will review the contents of this case and post a verdict as soon as I can.

You have about 39 hours from now to answer the questions.

No need to prove the lack of notification, just answer the questions since you are now aware of them

@faldorix is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Ethamn v. Faldorix [2025] DCR 30

@byleth_irl is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MrEntomology v. byleth_irl [2025] DCR 27

I am dismissing this case, Sua Sponte. The issue of this case is all the damages were retroactively caused by the plaintiff. They went out and committed the crime of murder that got them arrested in the first place. Interception only did his job as a member of the DHS in arresting a criminal...

At the request of the plaintiff, this case is dismissed with prejudice

@Mask3D_WOLF and @EpicFought will be held in contempt if they do not answer the questions in the next 48 hours without notifying the court if they need more time.

Objection #1: Assumes facts not in evidence Overruled. The firing clearly seems to be the result of actions taken by the plaintiff. Objection #2: Assumes facts not in evidence, argumentative Overruled. This question is not asserting that firing the plaintiff was the best course of action, only...

OK the defense has 72 hours to provide their answer to complaint

My apologies, I would have done it sooner, but my dorm building had issues with its Wi-Fi for the last couple days. A public defender has been requested, and the case will move forward once the PDD assigns one to this case.