Search results

PERJURY We provided the date of February 27, 2025 and this is shown in Exhibit P-008.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honors, in this appeal, Justice Compass Law Firm was representing itself - not the Plaintiff of FCR 26, as such we have no standing to even file an appeal for the case as a whole, let alone have it accepted. As seen...

Furthermore, your honors, the case of FCR 26 was not appealed.

Your honor, as mentioned in the original filing, I am representing Justice Compass, Ltd. - not MysticPhunky. I don't understand how we could file this case?

Your honor, we ask for clarification: Only the countersuit was appealed, not the entire case. What is expected to be refiled?

Username: Dartanboy I am representing a client Who is your Client?: Justice Compass, Ltd. (I am the CEO - This is my proof of representation) What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 26 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26 Basis for...

Your honor, I will very busy this weekend, could I get a 24 hour extension?

Justice Compass Law Firm will be representing YeetGlazer. Note, it may not be me directly, but an employee of the law firm.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Introduction The Defendant, Naezaratheus, is a fraudster who intentionally and maliciously tricked the Plaintiff, Vanguard & Co, into paying him more than $9.3 Million through a series of fraudulent stock trades, and...

Your Honor, Throughout the course of this case, the question at hand has been simple: did the murder of the Plaintiff by the Defendant cause harm beyond the scope of a normal murder? The answer to that very question is also simple: Yes. By killing the Plaintiff, the Defendant produced a crime...

MOTION TO STRIKE My apologies, your honor. I responded to a response, which is not permitted.

The Defense has admitted that their claims are "a mischsracterization of what actually happened" and is now trying to disguise it as a grammatical error. Given the abundance of evidence and the Defense's confession, we ask that these statements be struck for Perjury.

Perjury Defendant once-again claims these transactions involved "in-game market mechanics" but this did not occur in-game, as stock-trading activities cannot occur in-game. Furthermore, the Defendant asserts they did not exploit anything while also claiming they were "exploiting ... mechanics"

Perjury Stock-trading activities do not and cannot occur in-game. This is a lie.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS On Contractual Remedies The Terms of Service do indeed say "including" instead of "including but not limited to" however the Defense is incorrect in stating that this makes the list exhaustive. Oxford defines...

I apologize for not providing it sooner. On top of massive legal work in Redmont, I was also busy IRL. Regardless, the points I was going to make have already been brought up by parties in this case. An Amicus Brief would not prove helpful. I hope you will not be dismayed at my withdrawal of...

Breach of Procedure Responses to responses are not permitted.

Clearly, he has been un-deported. He certainly  was deported.

Breach of Procedure Naezaratheus is deported and cannot contest the lawsuit. We ask this Motion be struck and Vernicia warned for speaking in a court case without cause. If it is for some reason not struck, we ask to be permitted a response.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT INTRODUCTION Your honor, this case is a simple one. The Plaintiff attempted to distort reality and convince you that somehow my client is liable for some nearly non-existent damages. Unfortunately for the Plaintiff, the facts...