Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Privacy Matters Class Action Group Plaintiff v. Vanguard Securities LLC Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM that "Vanguard Market Access, operated by Defendant, requires users to agree to Terms of Service and a...
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    PERJURY They have included a supposed screenshot of KingBOB99878 consenting (In P-008), but the screenshots provided by KingBOB99878 himself show this did not happen. This suggests the evidence was forged.
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Whilst technically not falling under Rule 5.7 - Failure to Include Party, the Defense alleges that the Plaintiffs' Counsel has fabricated the list of Plaintiffs. We believe this egregious violation is worthy of dismissal with...
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending MysticPhunky v. Naezaratheus [2025] SCR 8

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT If a Writ of Certiorari is not issued, we request Default Judgement as the Defendant is deported and lacks the right to contest this lawsuit in court.
  5. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending MysticPhunky v. Naezaratheus [2025] SCR 8

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Appeal which this case was born from was not an Appeal for this case, rather an Appeal of the Countersuit which took place in [2025] FCR 26. This was abundantly clear in the Appeal. As such, we ask the Court to provide...
  6. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending MysticPhunky v. Naezaratheus [2025] SCR 8

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MysticPhunky (represented by Justice Compass Law Firm) Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. MysticPhunky (Plaintiff) 2. Naezaratheus (Defendant)...
  7. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    On breach of procedure, as said previously Nexalin was busy with school. Regardless, I'm not sure what this Objection seeks? On perjury: He did say "up to this point" but only 1 payment was due "up to this point" so I don't see how this is perjury.
  8. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    BREACH OF PROCEDURE Naezaratheus is not afforded the right to respond, as he is deported. We ask this request be struck and ignored.
  9. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Defendant has been deported again, and lacks the right to contest this suit in court. We ask for Default Judgement.
  10. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Introduction Your honor, Naezaratheus is a fraudster; a fraudster who has committed such a massive-scale fraud that it dwarfs even the most heinous of crimes from the past. This is no small-time criminal; this isn't an...
  11. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    Your honor, it appears Nexalin has been preoccupied with school today and we ask for a final extension of 12 additional hours.
  12. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    May we have an extra 24 hours due to Easter celebrations this weekend?
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    May we have an extension through the holidays this weekend?
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    I apologize for the uncouth vocabulary, your honor, but Objections and aggressive Motions are harshly overused these days, and it drives me up a wall. RESPONSE TO MOTION 1. On presumption of innocence: it is the court's job to presume innocence until shown otherwise, and it is my job to show...
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    May we respond to this ridiculous motion, your honor?
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    I am present on behalf of v__d.
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    BREACH OF PROCEDURE While it is standard practice for the courts to ask clarifying questions, never has it been done, as far as I am aware, in Redmont's 5-year history that the courts have required new evidence to be submitted. Furthermore, even if it was, certainly after Closing Statememts is...
  18. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 26 - Countersuit Verdict Appeal

    Your honor, given that this Appeal has been moved to the Archive, I request clarification on whether the above motion is being considered.
  19. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Introduction This case is simple, and so shall this Closing Statement be. The Plaintiff requires long drawn-out filings in an effort to warp reality to fit their narrative, but the Facts tell a short and simple story where...
Back
Top