The Motion to Dismiss is hereby denied. The Supreme Court did not find any reason in the motion to dismiss that can support a dismissal of the case. The points given were insufficient to convince the Supreme Court that this case could have been frivolous or enough to get the case dismissed.
We...
The extension is denied. The Office of the Attorney General is capable of defending this case at this moment in time. The Solicitor General or someone else can take this case on. I ask for a response within 36 hours.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Attorney General is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Kycnn1703 v. Department of State
Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment based on the known facts...
The Supreme Court has denied the emergency junction because no good arguments were given to support such an injunction and the reasons were too vague, please elaborate more if you want us to reconsider.
This lawsuit is moved to Supreme Court, because of the following reason: "In a case of extraordinary circumstance that doesn’t clearly fit into any established category, the Supreme Court can decide which level of court the case can be heard...
IN THE COURT OF COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case [2022] SCR 5
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
- The application to be a registered business at the DEC was rejected for being potentially "politically-charged". This would be a violation of Section IV Clause X of the Constitution of the...
It was not, it was in time delivered to the Court. As well because of the complexity of this case at this moment, will the Supreme Court take some extra time to deliver a decision on the Injunction and the Case itself.
The Supreme Court wants to take a closer look at the evidence first before ruling on an injunction. The Plaintiff is welcome to join the Closed Court channel.
Before the Supreme Court can rule on an emergency injunction we need to see the evidence. We would like to ask that the Plaintiff joins us in closed Court.
IN THE COURT OF COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case No. [2022] FCR 26.
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
- There was a contract established between the Plaintiff, Lynx, and the Defendant, AryaBroz. The contract specified that the Defendant could not leave the company for the first 2 months when the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.