Search results

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honour, This case is nothing more than a heartless attempt to tarnish the reputation of my client using underhanded means. At the heart of this case there is really a singular witness who clarified that only 2 murders...
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Happy Birthday Mr.Secretary!

    Happy Birthday Mr.Secretary!
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COUNTERCLAIM lawanoesepr (MikamiLaw LLC representing) Counter Plaintiff v. Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto (Dragon Law Firm representing) Counter Defendants COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows...
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Dr_Eksplosive v. georgelordx [2024] FCR 105

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Dr_Eksplosive Plaintiff v. georgelordx Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On the 9th of June, the Plaintiff had opened a ticket within the Discover Bank discord under the Vanguard...
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    The Defense has no questions for the witness your honour.
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 99

    Thank you Your Honour, Regarding Exhibit A, the plugin will inform the player being cuffed that they are being charged with all present wanted points against the player. However, officers must either manually select charges within the jail bus or press the select all (Emerald Block) to jail the...
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 99

    Your Honour, I would like to submit an Amicus Brief to the court as a Sergeant within the DHS. I believe I can shed light on the confusion regarding Exhibit A and the reduced jail time imposed.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, The witness A_S_H_E_R has failed to respond to the Prosecution's questions. The witnesses Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto and LandoPlayzo have failed to respond to the summons. The Defense moves...
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, This case is nothing but the culmination of hearsay and incompetence. The plaintiff erroneously claims that my client attempted to intentionally disrupt the Plaintiff's business, but has failed to provide any...
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    Your Honour, The Defense requests a 24 hour extension due to having recently travelled, in order to appropriately and sufficiently represent the Defendants interests.
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dragonfly0001, Brustklefurry, YourLocalDiabeto V. lawanoespr [2024] FCR 92

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Rule 5.5 Lack of Claim - The Prosecution claims that the Plaintiffs was not able to keep the store in operation...
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Act of Congress Reveille Prison Clinic Resolution

    Details on what basic facilities are required in the clinic, staffing requirements, how will prisoners be charged and more relating to the function of the clinic would be very useful.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Travelling

    Travelling
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, the evidence was submitted in conjunction with the Defense’s closing statement and the separation of the messages was to preserve proper formatting. I request the courts to reconsider this denial as the...
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Rescinded Judicial Remuneration Act

    I meant to vote AYE
  16. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO SUBMIT LATE EVIDENCE The Defense wishes to submit the following evidence, post discovery as it was only revealed after discovery had concluded, to aid the court in understanding the matter at hand.
  17. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, The Plaintiff claims that the bot did not malfunction and has failed to prove it. wetc, the owner put it that the bot malfunctioned. In a previous case, it has been confirmed that this functionality is a feature...
  18. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Steveshat v. supersuperking [2024] FCR 63

    Your Honor, Apologies for the tardiness but I have taken extremely ill and my colleague is in the process of shifting apartments. As such, I request a 24 hour extension to provide a proper closing statement Apologies for any inconvenience caused.
  19. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 14

    CLOSING STATEMENTS While the Plaintiff makes a compelling argument, there are critical exclusions and pitfalls to their claims. Firstly, the Plaintiff claims that the reversal of their selection as HOJC Chair was in violation of the Electoral Act. However, nowhere in the Electoral Act does it...
  20. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Steveshat v. HenryDz5 [2024] FCR 65

    Your Honour, The Prosecution's entire argument hinges on speculation. Their claims can be refuted easily in quick succession: A) The bot did not have a limit in place. While it can be said that the Defendant may have falsified evidence proving this in a previous trial, the Prosecution has...
Back
Top