In regards to the first statement, the objection is Overruled. The statement is an established fact within the cases the prosecution submitted as evidence.
In regards to the second statement, the objection is Sustained. The prosecution has failed to provide evidence to prove the Defendant's...
The Defense has 48 hours from the prosecution’s opening statement to post their own opening statement.
Prosecution, please take this time to correct your formatting.
Considering the gravity of this case, I will be issuing a one-time allowance. You have 12 hours from YOUR message to post your opening statement.
Defense will then have a subsequent 48 hours.
The prosecution has failed to file an opening statement within the allotted time.
Consider this the first and final warning to all parties to adhere to the deadlines set by the court. Subsequent infractions will result in a contempt of court charge.
The Defense now has 48 hours to file an...
The court accepts the reasoning provided by the defense, the Honorable Chief Justice Aladeen22 is hereby recused from these proceedings.
Discovery shall continue, deadlines remain in effect.
My apologies. The previous order is null and void.
Discovery is set for a maximum of 3 days. If both parties agree, discovery may be ended prematurely.
Upon the premature end of discovery, or after 72 hours have passed from this message, whichever falls first, the Defense shall have an...
In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject this motion.
The court finds that there is not enough evidence nor structured argument to warrant a complete incapacitation of the Defendant's legislative activities. The modified injunction will remain in place.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Upon review of the merits of the case, the Court has determined to accept a modified emergency injunction.
The Defendant is hereby suspended from partaking in any votes, or decisions that bear strict relation to this case...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Bardiya_King v Reveille FC [2024] FCR 82
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff holds exclusive ownership rights to the name 'Reveille FC'
2. The Defendants thus violated the Intellectual Property Act by maintaining an in game business of...
Apologies to all parties involved, this case was missed internally following Former Chief Justice SumoMC's resignation.
The Defense has 72 hours from this message to post their closing statement.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL
The court has carefully reviewed the arguments that both sides have presented thus far and provide the following:
I. RATIONALE
Prosecutorial power rests with the executive, and the Department of Justice, namely the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.