Search results

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Thank you. With the matter of representation settled, Discovery is set for a maximum of 72 hours.
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Rejected. Facts are to be disputed in an answer to complaint using evidence submitted during discovery; not in motion to dismiss. As far as the court is concerned, the facts remain undisputed till the defense asserts otherwise in a response filing. The use of Rule 5.14 (Factual Error) is for...
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    Overruled. Should the evidence be nothing but an attempt to cast the defendant’s actions in a new light, the plaintiff should be able to disprove this with evidence and facts, not conjecture from coincidence. The Defense has asserted that the evidence is to assist their opening argument, and...
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Denied. The Defendant has provided a reasonable request to the court for an extension - and have subsequently declared their presence.
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Given that you just barely missed the deadline, the customary summary judgement shall not take place. This court will wait for you to acquire legal representation. This is your final warning to adhere to court deadlines. Answering a summons is a simple thing, simply declare presence. If you are...
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    Overruled. The Plaintiff has provided reasonable justification for the submission of the evidence.
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2

    You may do so. You are hereby charged with contempt of court. Reserve commentary for #legal, not court cases you are not party to.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    You must answer all questions posed to you by plaintiff or defense. On the other hand, given that both witnesses have declared their presence within the allotted time frame, the Prosecution may proceed with examining their witnesses. Prosecutors have 48 hours to file the questions they wish to...
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    Thank you prosecutor. Discovery is hereby set for a period of 72 hours, and may be cut short upon mutual agreement by both plaintiff and defense.
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Overruled. It is no fault of the Defense that the Plaintiff failed to consider case precedent available to the public. Their closing statement will not be struck, and this trial is hereby in recess pending verdict. Thank you to both parties for meeting deadlines to the best of their abilities.
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    You may do so. Please file your response within the next 48 hours. Responses to the second degree are not permitted generally. The court finds that the Plaintiff’s responses does not warrant a special response. Overruled. The filing and the evidence submitted alongside make it very clear that...
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    Thank you. Please proceed with your brief.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    @bigpappa140 & @MysticPhunky is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. ko531.
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Please share what you wish to discuss and your relevant qualifications for the interest of the court. Thank you.
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre977 v. kesballo [2025] FCR 6

    @kesballo is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Plaintiff v. Defendant.
  16. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    @Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.
  17. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    For the interest of the court, what matters do you wish to discuss and what are your relevant qualifications?
  18. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Please provide proof of representation.
  19. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Please provide proof of representation.
Back
Top