Search results

The defendant has 72 hours starting now to submit their response to the complaint.

Can you please present your proof of representation?

Can the movant please demonstrate their legal foundation for their motion of summary judgement on the basis of this being a countersuit?

@Stoppers is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of NacholeBraa v. Federal Reserve Bank

I will be hereby denying the emergency injunction as filed by the plaintiff. The movant has failed to demonstrate that that remedies sought by the preliminary injunction will prevent irreparable damage which can not later be remedied by a permanent injunction or a court order.

48 hours is a sizable extension to a 72 hour deadline. I will grant 12 hours from the original deadline, and the second half will only be granted if you give the court a solid reason.

Sorry for two messages - same timeline applies. 48 hours for questions, 48 hours for responses.

The defence may cross-examine the witnesses called by the plaintiff.

I will give the plaintiff 48 hours to present their questions. The witness @Vernicia has 48 hours to respond upon the questions being presented.

@Vernicia is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont.

Apologies -- continuing the message here. As the witness has been quite active in the public channels, and given that he was given twice the amount that is normally afforded to witnesses and still yet has failed, I issue a warning to the witness @GnomeWhisperer and give 24 extra hours beginning...

I don't quite understand by what you mean you its "unreasonable" for you to "calculate and determine the exact extent to which [you] are contesting the damages", as I asked whether or not you contest the value given in the damages or the method in which it was calculated. There was no...

I will allow the defendant to state specifically to which extent they wish to contest the compensatory damages before I make a ruling on this.

Apologies for the delay. The Discovery period is hereby over. The plaintiff has 72 hours to provide the court their opening statement.

The court accepts the motion and dismisses the case without prejudice.

The plaintiff now may present questions to the witnesses, within the following 48 hours. The witnesses have a further 48 hours to answer, after which any follow-up questions may be asked within a further 48 hours, and so on.

@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of RaiTheGuy07 v. Commonwealth of Redmont.

@GnomeWhisperer and @Mask3D_WOLF are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont as witnesses.

I will be taking over this case. The case has hereby been refiled as [2025] FCR 20. The court shall hereby go into discovery to last a maximum of 72 hours unless explicitly extended.

Before a summons can be issued, can the plaintiff provide proof of representation?