Search results

  1. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    The court believes that the movant of the objection has failed to demonstrate the key elements of perjury to the court, and therefore this objection is overruled. We hereby enter the discovery period to last no more than 72 hours except in case of an extension.
  2. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    The defendant has 72 hours to submit their opening statement to the court.
  3. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    @Nexalin is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27
  4. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    I just violated what I preached in my previous post by forgetting to set a deadline. Do as I say, not as I do. The defence has 48 hours to answer the objection.
  5. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    The previous objection will be struck. For future reference, please try to minimise messages. You may include the reference to the mistake in your corrected objection, for example. As to the severity of the objection, the court will allow the defence to provide an answer before it makes a...
  6. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    Motion denied. You have not provided any substance as to how this does not comply with previous court decisions and have failed to provide any precedence. Also, please refer back to my previous post of; That being said, Granted.
  7. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    The defendant has 48 hours to cross examine the witness, and the witness has 48 hours to answer the questions after their submission.
  8. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11

    Motion denied. There was a very clear reason why they were allowed a week that was out of their control but a reason caused by the witness themselves. It was not a similar circumstance.
  9. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11

    The plaintiff has failed to meet their deadline. The court hereby finds Dragon Law in contempt. We will continue to closing statements. The plaintiff now has 72 hours for their closing statement.
  10. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    The plaintiff has 72 hours to fill an opening statement.
  11. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    While disallowed by the rules, it is common practice, and I have been instructed to allow such filings. Motion denied.
  12. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    You have 72 hours to submit a response to complaint.
  13. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    My apologies, continue. Same time limits apply. I will need to hear from them before the end of the case.
  14. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    The defendant has 48 hours to cross examine the witness, and the witness has 48 hours to answer the questions after their submission.
  15. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    I have just noticed that Boomsides, despite being an original filant, has not obliged with the witness summons. They will be charged with a contempt of court unless they can provide to the court a reasonable alibi. The other witness examination may continue as usual.
  16. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Summons have been issued in discord and in-game as I could not find the forums account of the defendant.
  17. ColonelKai

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    Hello, and good evening. I will be taking over this case as the previous presiding officer has vacated their position. Approved. Court finds defence's explanation satisfactory. Statement will be struck. As I have stated in 2025 FCR 20, Therefore, this objection is overruled. Can...
Back
Top