Search results

These.

The court will hereby enter recess pending a verdict.

The defendant has failed to demonstrate how. The plaintiff has listed multiple laws within their complaint. If taken at face value, these would constitute a valid case against the commonwealth. The plaintiff has technically included all the necessary parties into the parties section. However...

Objection overruled.

The court concurs with the plaintiff. However, it is also notable here that the question inherently asks for an answer that will be hearsay. Therefore, the question and answers will be struck. The plaintiff may feel free to file a motion to reconsider.

The plaintiff has 24 hours to respond to the objection.

I dont believe it is within the courts purview to disallow lawyers from representing due to Conflict of Interest. Unless the plaintiff can bring up any legal ground, the court sees no threat to the integrity of the case.

You have 72 hours to submit a response to complaint.

Sustained. You are allowed to re-file properly. The court acknowledges this countersuit and will rule on it with the verdict.

Please don't ask the court to "use common sense" and "be reasonable". That is our job and the insinuation is that we don't. Thanks. The defendant has 72 hours for their opening statement.

The plaintiff has 72 hours for their closing statement.

The question is relevant, the argument that this is an assumption is irrelevant, and whatever amount they had been planning on spending is a relevant fact, not an opinion. Objection overruled. While the question is at face value board indeed, looking at the context of the case, it is crystal...

The defendant has 72 hours for their closing statement.

Objection overruled. The court believes that the extra information provided by the witness is not unrelated and the question asked has been answered adequately. You may ask a follow-up question.

Understood. You have 72 hours to submit a response to complaint.

The court hereby retracts this statement and allows the same time limits to the plaintiff for the continuation of their examination.

Apologies, continue.

The defendant may now cross-examine the witness. 48 hours to present questions, and the witness has 48 hours starting from the time of presentation to answer them.

@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of twilight2660 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 28

The court hereby warns you for speaking out of turn. Repeat of this behaviour will result in a contempt of court charge.