Your honour, just to clarify, is the DoJ's previous response being allowed as the response to the motion to compel?
Since the original court order was for the DoJ to "provide either the employee policy from the time Epicfought was fired or provide evidence showing what exactly was edited between...
Good evening, your honor and everyone present,
Today I will demonstrate how verbal consent is still valid nowadays, and how, under established norms, the Defendant’s actions fail to fall under fair dismissal and undermine the very justice the DHS vows to protect and uphold.
On Murder and...
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
Your honour, the document attached serves only as evidence for the perjury objection. Perjury, to be considered, must show proof that the opposing party is aware that what they have said is false. (See Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10)
The Employee...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY
Your honor, in addition to not complying with our motion to compel, the DoJ is knowingly making a false statement, as we are certain there is a Department of Justice policy handbook which was valid at the time of my...
INTERROGATORY:
1. Does the Department of Justice only terminate employees if they break the current code of conduct?
2. Is it fair to assume that a prosecutor employed in the Department of Justice is more qualified in the law than a regular citizen?
3. Does the Department of Justice, to the...
Opposing counsel could have checked my bio before objecting, which points out that I am employed in Dragon Law.
I have also been assigned to handle this case.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
Your honor, since opposing counsel has not provided a relevant document detailing the DoJ's employee policy, we would like to request that the DoJ release their employee policy handbook for the time my client was employed...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE
Upon reviewing the full document from where D-003 was extracted, it is evident that the document was edited on December 25th, 2024. This date is after my client’s termination, and thus any mention of AI use could have...
Your honor, we request an additional 48 hour extension so we can get our client’s requested information privately from the Department of Homeland Security.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.