Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Your honour, just to clarify, is the DoJ's previous response being allowed as the response to the motion to compel? Since the original court order was for the DoJ to "provide either the employee policy from the time Epicfought was fired or provide evidence showing what exactly was edited between...
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Good evening, your honor and everyone present, Today I will demonstrate how verbal consent is still valid nowadays, and how, under established norms, the Defendant’s actions fail to fall under fair dismissal and undermine the very justice the DHS vows to protect and uphold. On Murder and...
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE Your honour, the document attached serves only as evidence for the perjury objection. Perjury, to be considered, must show proof that the opposing party is aware that what they have said is false. (See Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10) The Employee...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your honor, in addition to not complying with our motion to compel, the DoJ is knowingly making a false statement, as we are certain there is a Department of Justice policy handbook which was valid at the time of my...
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, I would like to please request a 30 hour extension for the opening statement deadline as I’m currently out of town.
  6. S

    Name The weirdest thing you ever ate.

    Nah it was pretty bad tbh
  7. S

    Name The weirdest thing you ever ate.

    I had crocodile soup when I went to cairns ps. Don’t go to cairns
  8. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    We would like to submit the following evidence:
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    INTERROGATORY: 1. Does the Department of Justice only terminate employees if they break the current code of conduct? 2. Is it fair to assume that a prosecutor employed in the Department of Justice is more qualified in the law than a regular citizen? 3. Does the Department of Justice, to the...
  10. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE Apologies, your honor. The message above was a mistype.
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Opposing counsel could have checked my bio before objecting, which points out that I am employed in Dragon Law. I have also been assigned to handle this case.
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your honor, since opposing counsel has not provided a relevant document detailing the DoJ's employee policy, we would like to request that the DoJ release their employee policy handbook for the time my client was employed...
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Upon reviewing the full document from where D-003 was extracted, it is evident that the document was edited on December 25th, 2024. This date is after my client’s termination, and thus any mention of AI use could have...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, we request an additional 48 hour extension so we can get our client’s requested information privately from the Department of Homeland Security.
  15. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, we request a 48-hour extension of Discovery as we have requested information from DHS and are awaiting their response.
  16. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We would like to add the following piece of evidence: P-012:
  17. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We would like to submit the following witness list: 1: Doc 2: IamJeb_ 3: Argen_Lee 4: RaiTheGuy07
  18. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    We submit this additional piece of evidence: P-011:
Back
Top