IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
Dartanman
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. No where in the Constitution does...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff
v.
Nexalin
Defendant
Your Honor, it has been shown throughout this trial that my client had no knowledge or participation with any of the crimes he is being prosecuted with. The...
Thank you, your Honor.
1. Would it be factual to state that you are the individual who is highlighted in black in the Commonwealth's 10th piece of evidence, which showcases a contract presented by my client on 9/01?
2. Based upon your previous testimony, has my client presented a contract to...
Your Honor, I apologize for the sudden post in this trial, however, I would like to inform the court that we will be taking over the legal defense in this case. As a Senior Attorney working with Prodigium | Attorneys at Law, I, along with my co-counsel, Matthew100x, will now be the respondent...
The Supreme Court has decided to reject the objection raised by the Plaintiff. As pointed out by the Defendant, speculation objections are reserved for examinations of witnesses, not the opposing counsel.
Additionally, the Supreme Court wishes to remind both parties of the option of an in-game trial, and if either should be interested to let that be known before moving to opening statements
The Supreme Court has decided to reject the motion to dismiss filed by the Commonwealth.
The motion has failed to point out any frivolous aspect to the lawsuit and therefore the court has decided to let the case continue.
The Plaintiff has 48 hours to provide the court with an opening statement.
In regards to the injunction filed, the court will be granting the request. The DCT is not to seize the disputed property during the duration of this case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS
The Attorney General is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of the Yeet_Boy v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 11
Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
The court has decided to grant this appeal. We have chosen to do so on the basis of renter's rights.
Please refile your appealed case in the Supreme Court sub-forum at your earliest convenience.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Case [2022] SCR 10
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
- Milqy contacted a Congressional candidate asking for them to drop out of the race
- During this, Milqy offered a reward in exchange for dropping out
- Offering a reward to drop out is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.