Search results

@faldorix is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Ethamn v. Faldorix [2025] DCR 30

@byleth_irl is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MrEntomology v. byleth_irl [2025] DCR 27

I am dismissing this case, Sua Sponte. The issue of this case is all the damages were retroactively caused by the plaintiff. They went out and committed the crime of murder that got them arrested in the first place. Interception only did his job as a member of the DHS in arresting a criminal...

At the request of the plaintiff, this case is dismissed with prejudice

@Mask3D_WOLF and @EpicFought will be held in contempt if they do not answer the questions in the next 48 hours without notifying the court if they need more time.

Objection #1: Assumes facts not in evidence Overruled. The firing clearly seems to be the result of actions taken by the plaintiff. Objection #2: Assumes facts not in evidence, argumentative Overruled. This question is not asserting that firing the plaintiff was the best course of action, only...

OK the defense has 72 hours to provide their answer to complaint

My apologies, I would have done it sooner, but my dorm building had issues with its Wi-Fi for the last couple days. A public defender has been requested, and the case will move forward once the PDD assigns one to this case.

A public defender will be issued for the defense shortly

Granted

Once all 3 witnesses are present the defense may begin questioning them

@Freeze_Line @EpicFought and @Mask3D_WOLF are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Epicfought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19.

@StaleUmbrella80 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Realimza v. Staleumbrella80 [2025] DCR 24

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Dartanboy v. Bepus [2025] DCR 22. I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The defendant slandered Dart by making a false statement accusing him of a murder he did not commit. 2. Someone took this false statement to be true cause Dart reputational harm...

Granted

The defense has 72 hours to post their opening statements

Sorry for the late response, even though opening statements already was posted this would have been granted anyways This motion and the motion to submit late evidence is denied. For one it was submitted after discover and late but also this policy doesnt serve mainly as a employee policy but as...

Granted. Case in recess pending verdict

Granted. Case Dismissed

Granted