Search results

The plaintiff does not object to extending discovery.

Response To Objections Your Honour, The Defendant’s objection, asserting that the Plaintiff failed to post proof of representation as required by district court rules, is misplaced. While proof of representation may be a procedural requirement, its omission does not invalidate the filing of the...

Response To Motion Your Honour, The Defendant has argued that our claim to legal fees is invalid by misinterpreting the relevant provisions of the law. Specifically, they rely on the Legal Damages Act, which states: "Lawyers are required to disclose their fee structure along with their proof of...

The Defence Wishes to enter the following as evidence Proof Of representation. Payment Structure

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant respectfully moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed. In support of this motion, the Defendant alleges as follows: Failure to Include the Defendant as a Party: The Plaintiff has failed to properly...

Titan Law will be repressing the defendant in this matter

Your Honour we are still awaiting witness summons.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE For the second time in this cases the defences council had failed to obey court policy and has posted an opening statement without being printed to a second time. I request that this be struck from the record...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, the main argument that the defence has given us is that “the plaintiff did not engage in any formal discussion with the defendant” and “The only contact to take place prior to the investigation.” However, none of...

Still pending a verdict.

Your Honour I request to still receive a verdict on the motion to dismiss.

The plaintiff does not wish for an in-game trial.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The Plaintiff has merely provided a general statement claiming entitlement to the funds based on the Defendant's...

The Plaintiff Wishes to call the following witnesses: Jeygame7816 - Plaintiff Razorsharpbread - Lead Investigator The Plaintiff also wishes to submit the following evidence P-008 (Titan Law Legal Fees Policy) P-009 (Proof of Representation)

The Discorver Bank User guide Containing all the policy's (D-001): Discover Bank User Guide The Discover Bank User Guide Edit History(D-002):Discover Bank User Guide

<br>IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT<br>OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure<br><br>The Defence has breached procedures as the answer to complaint should come after the discovery period as per the new court procedures [/CENTER]<br>

Your Honour the defence has not been allowed to file a opening statement I request that we be allowed to do so before discovery begins as is the defences civil right.

Your honour you are not able to make objections to objections. And only a response may be given.

Your Honour Titan Law Will be representing the defendant. Our response will follow shortly

<br>IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT<br>OBJECTION - RELEVANCE<br><br>This evidence, D-001, is not relevant because the charges billed to my clients have no bearing on the legal fees I am entitled to collect in this case.[/CENTER]<br>