OBJECTION
Relevance
None of what the Commonwealth said answers what the judge asked, these are just defences to everything I said. As such, all of this should be striked.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECUSE
In the Supreme Court, this exact same argument was made and it was overruled, which is precedent that this does not apply. As such, the Presiding Judge has done nothing wrong but follow precedent.
Case: Lawsuit...
Your Honor, may I respond to the motion to recuse? I believe I have important information that the court must consider in the motion to recuse. I require no more time than 24 hours.
Your Honor, it has been 24 hours and the Commonwealth has not responded. Along with this, the Commonwealth has also not responded to the objection for perjury.
As the option statement entirely depends on whether the guidelines were outdated or not, the Plaintiff has provided two opening statements. Please consider the opening statement which applies after the Commonwealth has given their answer of whether the guidelines were outdated or not.
Your Honor, I would like to request a 12 hour extension as I've had to study for my exams for the past week and didn't have time to formulate an opening statement. I would also like to request that our time to post an opening statement is paused until the motion to compel is accepted or denied...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
Your Honor, the Plaintiff is confused as to whether the guidelines are outdated or not, and this is information needed for our opening statement, and the Commonwealth hasn't responded to the objection for perjury, we would...
OBJECTION
Perjury
Your Honor, the Commonwealth stated:
Fraud would not apply here for the simple fact that no one was defrauded. the guidelines are not outdated, the players bank balance is an acceptable means of having the funds to bid. This is how it has always been
But in this screenshot...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS
The plaintiff will argue each point brought by the Commonwealth:
1. The commonwealth request that this case be dismissed on multiple reasons, firstly the case law that has been quoted by the defendant as...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
The Plaintiff wishes to strike the entire motion to dismiss, as it does not state in anyway whatsoever why the case should be dismissed and is only giving arguments in the case, which should be placed in an answer to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY INJUCTION
The Plaintiff ask that c610 is removed from Bombaz2005 until this case ends, to prevent it from being sold off to someone else or to have changes to the build that will be hard to repair or irreparable.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
zLost
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
An auction for c610 was created, and as I was interested in the plot, I bid on it and engaged in a...
OBJECTION
Ambiguous
The questions asked by the Plaintiff are not clear and precise enough, as they haven't specified which accusal. According the Plaintiff earlier, Dumbyhead claimed that Bardiya "forged" the documents and also claimed that Bardiya got them fired. There are two accusals, and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.