IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant illegally canceled the ongoing auction mid-process, violating the Real Estate Guidelines and the Contracts Act by failing to complete the 24-hour...
The Plaintiff has raised a compelling ethical question—one that I believe deserves careful consideration. In short: I believe the harm caused by removing Dartanman from this case exceeds the harm caused by allowing him to stay, and I will hereby be denying the motion to reconsider.
In an ideal...
Apologies, a response is no longer necessary.
Denied. The Staff Team is testifying. Homelander is a part of the Staff Team. You can cross-examine them.
Overruled. Uncertainty is not speculation.
The defendant may now cross-examine the witness. 48 hours to present questions, and the witness has 48 hours starting from the time of presentation to answer them.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant sold a Tier 1 Supporter rank to the Plaintiff for $47,000. The transaction fulfilled the five essential components of a contract.
2. The Defendant did not fulfill...
Overruled. Intent to perjure has not been proven, and the statement in question, while somewhat confusing, is not actually false, but instead strange phrasing as a result of filing a joint lawsuit.
Overruled. Intent to perjure has not been proven.
It is entirely possible that both "the...
This motion is denied. The Defence was granted permission to reply, but simply quoted the wrong permission.
Do not speak out of turn. This is your warning. Any further unprompted comments will have you held in contempt of court.
Sustained. The Defence did receive permission to respond...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.