Search results

Sustained, due to IRL commitments the witness list presented by the defendant will be allowed.

The objection is sustained. I feel Augustus/Dartanboy's identity is not relevant to the case and will not be considered.

The motion to reconsider is sustained. The plaintiff deserves a case to hear the merits of the intellectual property claim. The intellectual property claim and the prayer for relief related to the claim are reinstated.

Objection overruled. The statement does indeed fall under the hearsay exception.

The objection is overruled. The article is relevant to the case and will be considered.

The motion is sustained, and the intellectual property claim is dismissed. Quoting someone does not constitute an infringement of intellectual property. The prayer for relief related to the claim is stricken as well.

The witness list has been submitted past the discovery extension.

I am requesting a sidebar with the plaintiff's attorney, the defendant's attorney and Dartanboy.

The plaintiff has 72 hours to provide a closing statement.

Is Mr.Love not representing your newspaper organization?

The extension was granted at 3:12pm, there is still time left.

Extension granted

The Defendant may cross-examine the witness now

Discovery has now ended. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to provide an Opening Statement.

The motion is sustained, the plaintiff is allowed to amend the complaint.

The motion to reconsider is sustained. The court finds that the objection raised by the plaintiff does not justify refusing to answer the question. The plaintiff is therefore compelled to provide a straight answer to the question given by the defendant.

Both objections are overruled. Nevertheless the Defendant's intention of providing the information, the testimony clearly shows that the Defendant picked and kept the drill. Whether the Defendant planned to give the information or not it is still relevant to the case. The ambiguity in the...

The objection is overruled. The response given by the plaintiff was necessary to address the motions presented.

This court believes that there is merit in the arguments presented. Furthermore, the defendant's motion to compel and motion to strike are overruled. The court agrees with the points given by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's original response to the defendant's question will stand.

The motion to compel is sustained. The plaintiff is requesting legal fees but has not provided the details of the fee arrangement with their attorneys. To grant these legal fees, the Court requires full disclosure of the fee structure. Therefore, the Plaintiff is ordered to submit the retainer...