Search results

In an effort to prevent undue delay, I will provide a verdict with the information currently presented before the court as the statements seem to have come to a natural conclusion. Given the lack of evidence that the plaintiff sold to chests in locations that were marked "No entry" or similar...

IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The Court accepts the interpretation presented by the defence that the Statute of Limitations Act prevents prosecution for criminal acts two weeks or after they have occurred. The Court finds that the claim of fraud (selling to chest...

Given IRL commitments, I will grant the requested extension. The deadline for response is now 22:10 EST on 8th February 2021. Thank you for your quick response.

IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case Thomoray v Bunghungalow. Failure to appear within 24 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

This lawsuit is dismissed. Please use the appropriate format to appeal a ban in the correct thread. Please see the link below for the correct format. Bans can be appealed in the section 'Punishment Appeals'. https://democracycraft.net/threads/punishment-appeals-information.19/

I. Court’s Opinion As has been established by both parties, the fact there has been a breach of the regulations is undisputed. As of present, the ‘mental element’ of offences has not been defined within DC, but I appreciate both parties providing their analysis on this issue. I am not persuaded...

Fantastic, thank you to both parties - I'll provide my verdict shortly.

Both parties may now provide their closing statements. These statements can refer to arguments presented by the respective opposition. I would first ask the plaintiff to respond, with a subsequent response from the defendant. In the effort of keeping proceedings moving, I would kindly ask any...

I appreciate your candour and I wholly acknowledge that life always take priority. If you can draft a response reasonably quickly I'm happy to wait for, say, a further 12 hours? If the defence could have their response as prepared as can be, accounting for the fact that the plaintiff's...

My apologies to both the plaintiff and defendant, I got my wires crossed with the point we had reached in the trial earlier. Both parties may now provide any additional evidence. If either party does not have any additional evidence to share, they may reply noting that they do not have anything...

The defence has notified me of their readiness; the plaintiff may now present their opening statement. I thank the defence for proceeding quickly - it is appreciated.

The request from the defendant is granted. The new deadline for response is 03/02/2021 (UK DATE) at 16:34 GMT. I would ask the plaintiff to hold off providing their opening statement until notified by myself that the defendant is ready to continue.

My response to the aforementioned motion is as follows: The claim of personal relations is, in my opinion, immaterial when the context of what we are doing here is taken into account. At the present stage, the DC community is still somewhat close-knit. I believe Nacholebraa is not only friends...

This case has been dismissed due to an out-of-court settlement being reached. I'd like to thank both parties for their efforts in providing quick responses to this case.

My response to the defendant's motion to dismiss is as follows: 1. As of present there is no limiting Act regarding civil matters, only criminal matters. As such, the temporal distance between the event and the case is immaterial. 2. The report made was not an Eviction Report, rather, a...

IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case BubbaRC v Department of Construction and Transport. Failure to appear within 24 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

The report you have linked was a BI report regarding non-compliance, not lack of progress. As such, the facts of the case are incorrect. For this reason, this case is dismissed. If you are to resubmit a claim, you may do so in this current thread in an effort to minimise duplicate threads in...

My response to the defendant's motion to dismiss is as follows: 1. Previous evictions of plots should not equate to a tacit understanding that a player's plots are under surveillance. While it may make the owner aware of the regulations, prior evictions cannot form the notice for future...

IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case Intercepticon v Department of Construction and Transport. Failure to appear within 24 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

After reviewing the evidence provided by xEndeavour, and speaking to Nacho regarding the context in which the statement was made, I have no concerns if Nacho wishes to continue presiding over this case. There has been no substantive evidence provided regarding the claim of a conflict of...