Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. The DoJ & Executive Branch [2021] FCR 19

    My response to the objections of the plaintiff posted previously is as follows: The first objection is moot. It is my belief that the State wasn't asking you to present evidence of positive action, as your claim did not allege positive action was at fault. You had alleged an omission on behalf...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. The DoJ & Executive Branch [2021] FCR 19

    My apologies, I hadn't seen your message prior to typing my response. Please include them in your response to the counter-claim and I'll review them then.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. The DoJ & Executive Branch [2021] FCR 19

    MOTION TO DISMISS VERDICT The court finds that the submission made by the defence is correct. The standard of proof in this matter is only that of a balance of probabilities, but even so, the plaintiff's evidence does not surpass this threshold. The claims made against the defendant were not...
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. The DoJ & Executive Branch [2021] FCR 19

    The interjection may not go to the heart of your lawsuit, but the court still deems it knowledge of some significance. Your objection has however been noted. The defendant is to proceed with their response within the time allotted.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. The DoJ & Executive Branch [2021] FCR 19

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case Lord_Donuticus v The Government of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. The court will not...
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Thomoray [2021] FCR 18

    Due to this matter being settled outside of court, this case is now dismissed. I hereby rescind all existing warrants in relation to this case and the emergency injunction. Thank you to all parties for solving this with minimal court intervention.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Thomoray [2021] FCR 18

    Given the complex nature of the case and the constraints in contacting witnesses, I will accept this extension. This means the emergency injunction will be in place until 13:40 19/02/2021 GMT. Failing to respond prior to this will result in the injunction being nullified; a response within this...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Thomoray [2021] FCR 18

    May I ask that the subsequent lawsuit to be filed by the plaintiff is done so in this thread - thank you.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Thomoray [2021] FCR 18

    EMERGENCY INJUNCTION The requested emergency injunction has been granted. The terms of the injunction are as follows: - Thomoray is to hold any money presently in any company or personal balance owned by him, or in control by him, and to hold any money he receives until this injunction is no...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Lord_Donuticus v. The Government of DemocracyCraft [2021] FCR 17

    This case is settled in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff is mistaken if they believe this lawsuit has initiated changes to the Constitution. Indeed the relevant clause highlighted within the Constitution by the defence can be seen to have been active from at least the 7th January 2021...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Lord_Donuticus v. The Government of DemocracyCraft [2021] FCR 17

    I will now ask both parties to submit their closing arguments. You are each entitled to reference opposing submissions in your statements. I would first ask the plaintiff to provide their closing argument, with a subsequent response from the defendant. In an effort to maintain timely...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Lord_Donuticus v. The Government of DemocracyCraft [2021] FCR 17

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case Lord_Donuticus v The Government of Redmont. Failure to appear within 24 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. JoanM999 [2021] FCR 16

    I appreciate the request for an in-game trial, however, this is rejected due to the disproportionate logistical burden in reference to the public interest in this case. The defendant's answer to the complaint includes a motion to dismiss. The amount claimed for emotional damages does not...
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lord_Donuticus v. JoanM999 [2021] FCR 16

    IN THE COURT OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case Lord_Donuticus v JoanM999. Failure to appear within 24 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed byeSprite v. Department of Justice [2021] FCR 15

    Due to a lack of support to continue this lawsuit, this case is hereby dismissed. I thank the plaintiff for keeping the court informed.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed x1x1 v. The0re_ [2021] DCR 2

    Due to speaking out of turn in this case, I find you guilty of contempt of court and will be fining you $20. Continued discussion can lead to jail time. This is a court, not a cafe.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed x1x1 v. The0re_ [2021] DCR 2

    Please keep this thread and all other 'Court' threads only for official statements and court submissions otherwise you will also find yourself in contempt of court. I'd urge everyone to familiarise themselves with the law, these can be found on the 'rules' tab of the website's banner. Thank you
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed x1x1 v. The0re_ [2021] DCR 2

    This case in its current format does not conform to the required standard format lawsuits must be filed in. As such, the matter is dismissed. The correct format can be found in this thread (click here). If you are to file this claim again, you may do so under this thread to avoid duplicate...
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed x1x1 v. The0re_ [2021] DCR 2

    Due to speaking out of turn in this case, I find you guilty of contempt of court and will be fining you $20.
  20. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed CrackedAmoeba1 v. TheSpiceyLemon and Saddboie [2021] FCR 14

    This case in its current format does not conform to the required standard format lawsuits must be filed in. As such, the matter is dismissed. The correct format can be found in this thread (click here). If you are to file this claim again, you may do so under this thread to avoid duplicate...
Back
Top