Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defense petitions the court to dismiss this case, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: Under Rule 5.5 - Lack of Claim As the Plaintiff has now been paid, the lawsuit has no claim.
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    On The Content of the Motion 1. While much of the facts in the Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider are true, #7 is misleading. Although a Default Judgement may be requested by a Plaintiff, it is not required -- the quote says that something could be grounds to request it, but does not specify that...
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Speculation is when someone "testifies about something they have not directly observed" (see Objections Guide). Homelander/the staff team was certainly there.
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    No more questions, your honor.
  5. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Pending [2025] DCR 10 - Appeal

    Your honor, I was hoping to avoid posting this appeal until this one has been resolved: Appeal: Pending - [2025] DCR 10 - Appeal However, it has gone weeks with no response, so I had to post this one.
  6. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Pending [2025] DCR 10 - Appeal

    Username: Dartanboy I am representing a client Who is your Client?: juniperfig File(s) attached What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 10 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. juniperfig [2025] DCR 10 Basis for Appeal: Magistrate...
  7. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Hearsay is when you talk about what someone else said, not when you talk about what you said yourself.
  8. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    To follow up to Q4, since this was in a staff capacity, we are not able to summon JediAJMan/Homelander as a witness, rather we summoned the Staff Team. Can the staff team please provide Staff Member Homelander's testimony for the original Q4?
  9. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    I could be missing it, because the Defense's lawyer and their now-banned cronies have flooded the lawsuit with useless objections. But, I don't see such a permission. And filing a Motion is certainly not a Breach of Procedure. I suggest that Vernicia read up on the Court Rules and Procedures.
  10. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    MOTION TO STRIKE This is neither an Objection nor Motion.
  11. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Questions for Staff Team: 1. Do multiple clues appear in close proximity to each other when a murder produces a crime scene? 2. When a murder produces a crime scene, is it possible to place blocks where the clues appear? 3. In Exhibit P-003, JediAJMan (a.k.a. Homelander) is seen talking with...
  12. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    I trust the Department of Education will handle this appropriately.
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Your honor, I'm able to prove I've been an Attorney since March 5, if you'll permit me to show it.
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    Your honor, I apologize we were a few minutes late. The IRL matters have been sorted and it won't happen again.
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session MegaMinerM v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 27

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT MegaMinerM Plaintiff v. Blazora Corporation Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM that “on 23 September 2024, Nexalin founded Easy Corporation and thereafter listed a bond with a face value of $1,000,000 on The...
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    BREACH OF PROCEDURE AlexanderLove never showed proof of consent to represent the Defendant. He randomly appeared after twilight was banned and began representing the Defendant. We request all of his posts be stricken and ignored.
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    This is not true? Even if it is, the comments would be struck, not the evidence.
  18. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Staff team was summoned. He was acting as Staff not as a player. The witness will be asked to confirm the statements.
Back
Top