Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Introduction The Defendant, Naezaratheus, is a fraudster who intentionally and maliciously tricked the Plaintiff, Vanguard & Co, into paying him more than $9.3 Million through a series of fraudulent stock trades, and...

Your Honor, Throughout the course of this case, the question at hand has been simple: did the murder of the Plaintiff by the Defendant cause harm beyond the scope of a normal murder? The answer to that very question is also simple: Yes. By killing the Plaintiff, the Defendant produced a crime...

MOTION TO STRIKE My apologies, your honor. I responded to a response, which is not permitted.

The Defense has admitted that their claims are "a mischsracterization of what actually happened" and is now trying to disguise it as a grammatical error. Given the abundance of evidence and the Defense's confession, we ask that these statements be struck for Perjury.

Perjury Defendant once-again claims these transactions involved "in-game market mechanics" but this did not occur in-game, as stock-trading activities cannot occur in-game. Furthermore, the Defendant asserts they did not exploit anything while also claiming they were "exploiting ... mechanics"

Perjury Stock-trading activities do not and cannot occur in-game. This is a lie.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS On Contractual Remedies The Terms of Service do indeed say "including" instead of "including but not limited to" however the Defense is incorrect in stating that this makes the list exhaustive. Oxford defines...

I apologize for not providing it sooner. On top of massive legal work in Redmont, I was also busy IRL. Regardless, the points I was going to make have already been brought up by parties in this case. An Amicus Brief would not prove helpful. I hope you will not be dismayed at my withdrawal of...

Breach of Procedure Responses to responses are not permitted.

Clearly, he has been un-deported. He certainly  was deported.

Breach of Procedure Naezaratheus is deported and cannot contest the lawsuit. We ask this Motion be struck and Vernicia warned for speaking in a court case without cause. If it is for some reason not struck, we ask to be permitted a response.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT INTRODUCTION Your honor, this case is a simple one. The Plaintiff attempted to distort reality and convince you that somehow my client is liable for some nearly non-existent damages. Unfortunately for the Plaintiff, the facts...

Breach of Procedure The Defendant has been deported and per server rules, is not afforded any rights, even the right to appear in court. As such, the Plaintiff requests Default Judgement.

Your honor, we have both made informal statements. You can choose to ignore and strike on technicalities, or you could seek to preserve the fundamental principles of truth and justice. Regardless, this is a response to an Objection, which is permitted, so I'll address the points in the...

I won't keep responding so informally, but your honor, if you allow an Opening Statement I can show how the Plaintiff has not proved the disputed facts conclusively.

Additionally, your honor, my client is afforded the right to a fair trial. If their counsel drops the ball, as I did, the counsel should be held in Contempt but this should not be an excuse to punish my client and create an unfair trial.

Your honor, I sincerely apologize for being late. If you don't allow an Opening Statement, I understand, but I hope you will allow just 12 hours to submit one. This is completely my mistake, but I honestly got confused with the Opening Statement being simultaneously an answer to a Motion, which...

Your honor, I forgot to include proof of retainer. It is here:

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vanguard & Co (Justice Compass Law Firm representing) Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Vanguard & Co (Plaintiff; Victim) 2. Naezaratheus...

Your honor, as a Constitutional Expert and former Chief Justice, may I file an Amicus Curiae Brief regarding the nature and status of the Judicial Standards Amendment Act and Constitution?