Search results

You literally asked if the Court was still on strike, the Court responded. Now you question that? What would your witnesses attest to?

@Matthew100x, and the Department of Justice, is commanded to appear before the District Court

@Mvchrelle is commanded to appear in the District Court

@jjdizz1l is commanded to appear in the District Court for the case Meadowbrooke Bank v. JJdizz1l [2026] DCR 130

DENIED, there is no existing obligation that requires securitization.

Okay, so I dunno what this docket is, so we'll set some stuff straight. 1) This is the District Court, not the Federal Court. 2) Do not discuss nor argue without direction of this Court. Functionally, although not following the format, the Defendant has offered a compliant Answer. That...

I'm your Judge. There are no witnesses requested, so we'll proceed with a final closing brief. @SteelRain Please prepare and respond with a Closing Statement by 8/3/26 at 9pm EDT withe @Ebborsnam (the CW) having 72 Hours after submission in opposition. Include all arguments, point to the...

@Vudaaa @Ebborsnam reminder, please respond within 24 Hours.

Thank you. Discovery is now open until August 1st, 2026 at 9pm EDT

The action is dismissed without prejudice on application from Plaintiff.

SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order of Dismissal The Supreme Court unanimously grants the Commonwealth’s motion to nolle prosequi with prejudice. Without consideration for the remarks made by the Government’s counsel with respect to the political considerations of their...

@MMiqa The witnesses are present, please present your questions within 48 Hours. Plaintiff's Witnesses: MMiqa (Provide a narrative, please don't ask yourself questions) VudaSage @Ebborsnam

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Aventura [2026] FCR 44 Standing Standing requires (1) an injury, either through an application of law or caused by an identifiable party, (2) an unlawful cause, and (3) a remediable injury. ToadKing...

Action dismissed for want of prosecution. This is WITHOUT prejudice.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order of Dismissal - kisskissy v. stellar_night [2026] DCR 84 Discovery in this matter is closed. The Plaintiff has submitted no exhibits, produced no witness list, and answered none of the interrogatories served at #20 and #25, each of which...

@greymc @Sophiethesage Discovery is open until July 30th, 2026 at 9pm EDT.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - .Sophiethesage V. FluixIsh [2026] DCR 114 MMiqa v. ZachOfPotatoes10 [2026] DCR 67 holds that a private party may not prosecute a crime. It does not hold that criminal conduct is immune from civil consequence. The intentional...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Order Defense moves under Rules 5.5 and 5.12 praying for dismissal of Plaintiff's action. In review of the filings herein, the Court makes the following determinations. REMARKS ON THE CLAIMS The Complaint...

The action is dismissed for want of a Complaint.

Case dismissed on request of Plaintiff.