Search results

@Sophiethesage You have 48 Hours to respond.

Granted

No, you had already stated that you " cannot fulfill the request to identity any sort of provision." Unless you'd like to clarify, we have your answer on Q2

For the purposes of the EI, I'll be the PO. Granted. The Defendant's accounts shall be frozen and S129 shall be transferred to the the care of the Government for safeguarding.

This response is disregarded. Ebborsnam you are not representing the Commonwealth, stop filing objections on their behalf. You may not contest questions as a witness nor respond to party objections. Likewise, @MMiqa your entire filing is disregarded. I have eyes, I can read, I do not need a...

Certainly, take until 8/8/26 at 9pm EDT

The Court is in recess in inquest. A verdict will be rendered shortly.

@Incarnation__ @MJL Are we done with witness questioning?

Sustained. That being said, the witness stated he could not identify a provision requested.

@Matthew100x I believe your prosecutor quit in this case, you'll need to assign someone anew for the Govt. With respect to the questions and the subsequent objections, the Court strikes Ebborsnam's contestations to Plaintiff's questions. To dispute the questions is to put oneself in the...

The use of profane language in court is distateful and grossly inappropriate. For disrupting the decorum required, @Ebborsnam is found guilty of Contempt of Court and shall be fined $1,000.

Removed to the District Court

@ko531 You wish to continue the action? If so, please present witness questioning in line with this Court's regulations in 48 Hours.

Dismissed with prejudice.

Vudaaa filed an LOA until September, the Court won't penalize this out of funadmental fairness. <https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/vudaaa-filed-leave-of-absence.40767/> With respect to the objections, I've overlooked them and will be issuing rulings forthwith.

@Patototongo1 You have 48 Hours to respond to the Motion to Dismiss.

We shall proceed to discovery. Discovery shall close on 8/8/26 @ 9pm EDT

Thanks General, please respond with an Answer within 48 Hours.

There are no witnesses, there's no reason to hold a trial.

Denied. This case has been ongoing since June 19th and the identity of these witnesses were known to you PRIOR to discovery and PRIOR to the strikes. You should've included them earlier. Further, witnesses who "attest to the specific laws" would be rejected.