On review of submitted evidence, the Court will proceed to verdict. The Court sees sufficient evidence for repeated murders and does not need an eyewitness to verify the same.
p-019 is struck as hearsay.
Without regard for any statements made between the submission of this moment now, this motion is DENIED. It's excessively broad and prejudicial to Co-Defendant Vernicia.
Point #1 is redirected to Vernicia (@ameslap vis;)
Request 2 is granted, insofar considering the CW's response. Ideally...
Granted.
Motion to Vacate deadline is 9/4/26 at 9pm EDT.
Pose questions to your witness and have them respond to the questions on this thread.
Inquest Discovery is open until 9/1/26 at 9pm EDT
The use of IRL law in your Reply Brief is distasteful. IRL authorities should only be used as "historical or factual background" (Rule 1.12 3 (c)). I understand the concept you're raising, but citing Griswold is not it.
The Court enters recess, we may ask questions as needed.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.