Search results

The action is dismissed for want of a complaint.

For the sake of judicial economy, the Court will reopen discovery. Discovery now open until July 25th, 2026, at 9pm EDT.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - Slime_Mario v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 92 SUMMARY OF MOTION Rule 9.2 permits the Court, once an issue has been heard and it finds no legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for a party on that issue, to resolve the...

@AmityBlamity Does the Govt still wish to continue the action?

The Plaintiff lacks the appropriate license to practice before this Court, the case is dismissed.

Case dismissed without prejudice.

The law doesn't require that a prayer for legal fees be included in a complaint to be awarded. Furthermore, in line with precedence, if the motion is NOT with prejudice, then they won't be awarded.

These summonses are of no effect, the Court will summon defendants. Any Red Team member able to authenticate the signs, access controls, ownership, inventory, and replacement values. Any appropriate custodian of server or chest-shop records, should the authenticity or completeness of the...

Discovery is extended to 48 Hours AFTER the cessation of the Federal Court's strike. The Closed Court session is granted, I'll make a closed court thread. Check your forums DMs for invites to the Judiciary discord.

Granted, the Court will adjudicate the pending motion.

What are we going to learn that can't be read in from the Complaint (and associated evidence) from 11 witnesses, including the Staff Team?

@gribble19 Please prepare a brief for the Town as previously ordered by July 17th, 2026 at 9pm EDT.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Decision, Memorandum and Order - Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 85 | [2026] FCR XXX Appellant, ZachOfPotatoes10, through counsel CreeperTD, appeals the District Court's judgment in AvatarNate7983, UnitedBoss v. Hincho_ [2026] DCR 85 on the sole...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Decision, Memorandum and Order - Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 67 | [2026] FCR XXX Appellant, ZachOfPotatoes10, through counsel CreeperTD, appeals the District Court's judgment in MMiqa v. ZachOfPotatoes10 [2026] DCR 67 on the sole ground that the...

The action is dismissed for want of compliance of Court Rules and failure to adhere to the orders of this Court. Future filings that do not comply with Court Rules or otherwise appear to be deficient will result in penalties.

You have 48 Hours to offer proper citations to Redmont law as required under Rule 1.10. Furthermore, please explain under what authority this Court has to do a staff command (/invsee) and what "CIVIL ACTION NO. _______" is.

DENIED Rule 3.5 (Amendment Exception) Amendments to an Answer or Complaint cannot change information that was already submitted.

Partially sustained. Mask3d's remark is struck, but the AG's retraction of the motion is not out of order.

Granted, insofar as it is recognized that counselors are public defenders and will not be held liable for their inability to confirm this if unable to reach defendents.

@Johnes You have 48 hours to respond.