Search results

Added extra wants to the Objection, I apologize for not including it before

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, These images have failed to attach properly and should be struck. Additionally, you had just stated: It is not yet Discovery. These should also be struck. I also request you hold the Plaintiff's...

Fixed @Sujal1048! This looks good! I will comment more when I get home in like 4 hours or something like that

I would also like to inform the Court that I will not be representing @Nutuli anymore.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Plaintiff's Counsel has failed to hyperlink the Criminal Code Act the first time that it was mentioned. This breaks Court Rules and Procedures 1.10. Signed, EmeraldGuuy Co-Counsel for the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, @Y8I has failed to provide proof of representation. This breaches the rules in Creating a Lawsuit in the District Court. I apologize for this being so short and informal as I am having to type this...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, I request that your honor DENY this Motion. This Motion cites the BAR's Legal Code of Conduct, which is not a law passed by Congress. As seen in MMiqa v. BAR Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion for Summary Judgement Your Honor, As the Defense and Plaintiff do not dispute the facts, the Co-Defendant is requesting a Summary Judgement. Signed, EmeraldGuuy Counsel for the Co-Defendant

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Roy399 Plaintiff v. _Flamehat_ Co-Defendant I. Answer to Complaint 1. The Defence AFFIRMS that the Church of Staffatology, or just known as Staffatology, is the Plaintiff’s company which he is the sole owner of. 2. The...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The Forge Plaintiff v. roy405 Co-Defendant I. Answer to Complaint 1. The Defense DENIES that frodo1005 posted an advertisement about bulletproof armor as there is no evidence to prove such. 2. The Defense AFFIRMS that...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, While I admit that I did not mention my intention of using the screenshots in my slideshow, I still did not lie in this court. I had said “I have the legal protection to use this in a court of law” because the Plaintiff, Roy399, had just said “considering your...

This Act has failed in the People's Will.

@Poker Your Honor, I am requesting a 24 hour extension to write the answer to complaint because I have to write a separate answer to complaint and I have a few tests I have to study for IRL. I will likely post it before the extension, however I am requesting it just in case I need it. @roy404...

Response to Objection RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, I asked my teacher if I would be able to use pictures of Minecraft buildings instead of regular buildings for a Project. This is not a lie. Also, I had said "im thinking about it" when I was asked if I would join Staffatology. I have...

Your Honor, may I edit the Response to Objection and put the third image in a spoiler? This is purely stylistic.

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION This is a misunderstanding. I take architecture class as an elective in real life and was merely using certain buildings for inspiration for my next project. Your Honor, in P-055, it clearly shows me talking about it being "a nice building". This further proves that the...

Your Honor, I would like to request a 48 hour extension as the Defendants did not have a Council previously.

:nay: -Third and final vote, original stance still stands as I don't believe we should clutter our Constitution. If I abstained, this would've passed. We can't clutter it like this. While funny, I won't just abstain and let this pass.

Votes prior to Amendment WL 1.10 (Bardiya_King and sonofalancer votes should be discarded as they are not commissioners.)

:nay: - I have changed my mind, we should not be cluttering our Charter like this. It’s funny and in any other case I would be fine with this, however We don’t want clutter. Me no like Ai slop. Re-propose this not as a charter amendment, without the ai slop, and a few more amendments and I would...