Search results

Objection sustained.

This entire motion is struck from the record as it constitutes a breach of procedure to file two separate motions to reconsider on the same issue. Just for the record, you asked me if I used AI tools to write my court order. I did not. Do not try and twist my words counselor.

Sustained. You may respond to the Motion to Nolle Prosequi.

Granted, the 72 hour deadline starts now.

I did not. You will be charged with another count of contempt if you fail to adhere to my instruction above and continue to make out-of-turn statements.

The hallucinations were the following, as is stated in my order: - Claim that the following section was in the CCA on June 2, 2026: "In civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed" - Claim that the Redmont Civil Code Amendments Act amended CCA Part I...

Motion denied. Ground one Refer to the following: Ground two The order to appoint a Public Defender was issued by then-Judge Dartanboy, not myself. I simply fulfilled it. Furthermore, the Information - Public Defence Policy states that: So the Presiding Officer has complete discretion to...

Motion to Reconsider denied. Point I Plaintiff first alleges that a warning must always be given before a contempt charge. This is false. Rule 1.4.2 states that: Additionally, the Contempt of Court charge in the Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act states that failure to abide by an order is...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Plaintiff is hereby ordered to answer the question of why the Court should not dismiss this case sua sponte for lack of a legally cognizable claim under the Act of Congress - Redmont Civil Code Act and why it should...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - CONTEMPT, CONDUCT STRIKE In reference to this brief: I find that Attorney @MMiqa has engaged in conduct that interferes with the administration of justice by heavily relying in the use of AI for drafting legal briefs and therefore...

Overruled. The Court finds that it is not possible to suggest that the statements were made knowingly. Denied. Adequate counsel has now been assigned to the Defendant. We have a Public Defense program for a reason. Objection overruled, however all objections from the Defense will be...

Counselor, is this your new legal brief? Amendments should be changes to specific things, not a submission of a different brief. I'll make a ruling on the objection once I receive a response.

@Novakerbal please respond to the motion within 24 hours. Also, I believe some of the attachments in your initial filing did not attach correctly. That being said, Discovery is now open and will remain open for 5 days.

@Cpvp_dog is hereby commanded to appear in the Federal Court in the case of lemmou & .Hyrophant12 v. Cpvp_dog [2026] FCR 71.

@MJL Just a reminder to post the brief within 72 hours of this post.

Granted. I see you didn't make it though, you have 24 hours from this post to submit the brief.

Plaintiff (cc: @Palacity) you have 72 hours to file a response to the motion to dismiss, if you wish.

I will let my fellow JOs know that this case requires reassignment, I recuse due to obvious reasons

If no further pending items remain, @MJL please submit your legal brief. After this, we shall move into recess pending verdict.

Find the order returns attached below.