Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CONTEMPT Attorney @MMiqa has previously been expressly warned not to treat this as a conversation. Rather than desist, they frame their responses as a motion to strike and acknowledge that: Mere filing of a Motion to Strike is fine. However...
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Motion denied. The first quote is pertinent to the case, as it is part of your Judge's ruling. Plaintiff only offers a disagreement with the language used in the second quote, not a legal argument in favour of striking said section. The third quote is part of my ruling; ergo, it is pertinent to...
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Motion denied. You seem to be trying to move for me to reconsider the Contempt of Court charge in Lawsuit: Dismissed - MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69. This is a different case, and your motion to reconsider does not add any substance to your original motion. Judge shopping is not allowed in...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    I find @Ebborsnam GUILTY of Contempt of Court. They shall be fined 30 Penalty Units and be imprisoned for 5 minutes.
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Overruled. There is little similarity between both situations.
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    You are hereby warned not to make unprompted statements in open Court. Failure to abide by this order may result in Contempt charges. This is not a conversation.
  7. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Northwind Financial Group v. Cpvp_dog

    Good evening @gribble19, just making sure you are still pursuing this case. Please let me know
  8. S

    Lawsuit: Pending Themoneylord v. Coslos [2026] DCR 152

    @TheREALWINner Is this case still being pursued? Also pinging @Muggy21 for good measure
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session 3mkTalal v. legoear [2026] DCR 52

    Plaintiff @3mkTalal, are you still pursuing this case?
  10. S

    Lawsuit: Pending SCRGabriele180 v. Department of Homeland Security

    Hi @SCRgabriele180, do you still wish to pursue this case?
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    The motion was already ruled upon by myself and is under review by another JO so I’m afraid I cannot allow that
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Sustained. I will rule on the motion to reconsider after another JO responds to the Motion to Recuse.
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Plaintiff moves to recuse based on bias, or the appearance of bias, against the Plaintiff due to a recent conviction of Contempt of Court, and that I decided to take the case based on these recent events. This last allegation is unfounded, my docket was left with one case less and so I looked...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    Attorney @Ebborsnam is again found GUILTY of Contempt of Court. They shall be fined 30 Penalty Units and serve 5 minutes imprisonment.
  15. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    I did warn you. Attorney @Ebborsnam is found GUILTY of Contempt of Court. They shall be fined 30 Penalty Units.
  16. S

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] DCR 142

    I am your presiding officer. Attorney @Ebborsnam is warned that one more uncalled-for post from you will result in a hefty contempt charge
  17. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    This civil action is dismissed with prejudice at the request of the Plaintiff.
  18. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    The Court agrees with this interpretation, and precedent does as well. Plaintiff @MMiqa, if you do not retract your motion to nolle prosequi, I will dismiss this case with prejudice as set forth by then-Judge Multiman155 in...
  19. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CONTEMPT CONVICTION Disobedience of a lawful order of the Court Attorney @MMiqa has failed to abide by a lawful court order not to make out of turn statements in the following instances: The Plaintiff was previously warned by this Court...
Back
Top