Search results

Please resubmit the video evidence to a permanent link, once that's done I will issue summons.

Very well. I understand IRL comes first so I won't punish you or anything. Just remember to always let your PO know that you can't make the deadline Court is now in recess pending verdict.

Deadline extended by 8 hours.

Sustained. Plaintiff @MMiqa please make the necessary changes.

Objection overruled, I will not strike it as it serves no legal purpose anyways.

Objection overruled, Plaintiff seems to be misusing the objection to argue against the original conduct, not the linked response to the objection. Plaintiff is warned that further attempts of abuse of process will not be tolerated.

Proof of mens rea is not sufficient, objection overruled.

Evidence served as proof for the purposes of the Defendant's perjury objection. Motion denied.

Case is remanded to the District Court and will be renumbered accordingly.

Objection overruled. There is not enough evidence to affirm that the statements were made knowingly, nor that some of these statements are unequivocally false (they are under contention and will be resolved within the trial).

This is similarly struck.

Change was one minor clerical edit to change a section number. Objection overruled. That being said, the following filing: is struck from the record. Plaintiff is free to amend their complaint in accordance with the Court Rules of Procedure.

I will remain your PO. Discovery is now open and shall remain open for 5 days. Remember that parties may agree to end Discovery early.

Case is remanded to the Federal Court. It has been renamed accordingly. Motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Very well, it's accepted. Court is now in recess pending verdict.

I was under the impression I had struck all of them, thank you for letting me know. All of Ebborsnam's posts are struck from the record.

Your motion (Docket #23) said: "I specifically asked any Judge but him. I am ok to wait for a while until another Judge is fit to serve in this case." That is the statement I'm referring to when using the term Judge shopping. Motion denied.

Please present your answer to complaint within 48 hours.

@BAR Association of Redmont (cc: Chairperson @CreeperTD) is hereby commanded to appear in the Federal Court in the case of MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72.

Additionally, I find this sentence to be nonsensical. The comparison was drawn by you, counselor. In your objection. If there was something else you meant by this, then please proofread your work. Otherwise please treat this Court with respect under Rule 1.4.2.1 of the Information - Court Rules...