Search results

Requesting a 24 hour extensions Your Honour.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT Breach of Procedure Your Honour, responses to responses are not permitted. If the defendant has something they wish to clarify regarding their theory, they should have added it in the initial Motion to Dismiss.

Response to Motion to Dismiss Your Honour, Defense's argument that Count II of Obstruction of Justice lacks standing is nonsense. Counsel seems to be implying that Obstruction of Justice solely applies if the accused intervened during the collection of clues. The actual definition reads as...

Permission to respond, Your Honour?

Your Honour, we do not consent to closing Discovery early.

I will prosecute anyone who questions the glorious Judge Mug.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Your Honour, the defendant has failed to appear. However, he has been active in the past 30 days. I humbly request the Court proceed with Default Judgement.

Your Honour, I'd like to formerly apologize. The crime took place on February 11, 2026, not 2025. Placing us within the 4 months permitted by the SoL. With your permission, I would like to amend the complaint to reflect the correct date.

Thank you, Your Honour. I will deliver my Amicus Brief in the form of a collage.

Your Honour, I wish to file an Amicus Brief. Also, anyone who posts below me is a dork.

Your Honour, The Courts of Redmont have previously allowed for suits to be filed against NPCs. The most infamous example of course being Dartanboy v. Robert [2024] DCR 9, where defendant's counsel successfully sought civil damages for robbery. The Federal Court has also allowed this exact case...

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We request that this Court move to suspend Gregg from his position for the duration of this court case. Due to Gregg's ineptitude and clear disdain for the Commonwealth, it is clear he can no longer be trusted.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Gregg Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: On or about the 25th of March, our democracy suffered a crippling blow...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. wttn2c Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: On February 11th, 2026, Vennefly was acting in his official capacity as...

Your Honour, acting in my capacity as director for Energy Corp, I can affirm the settlement agreement.

Your Honour, the plaintiff and the defendant are on the cusp of a settlement agreement. In the event of such occurring, would you rather the crossclaim be filed in a separate thread?

Interrogatories: 1) Did Culls engage in settlement negotiations with the plaintiff on behalf of Energy Corp? Defendant reserves the right to ask further interrogatories.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT Objection - Relevance Your Honour, while I understand why the plaintiff wishes to call myself and Culls to the stand, Multiman155 and Dodrio3 are, respectfully, irrelevant to this case. Plaintiff is, broadly speaking, alleging contractual violations by Energy...

1) Yes. 2) I believe we affirmed the checkbox, and wrote "Amity Justice and Culls" in the company officers box. 3) It did not. 4) ECO believed it could meet the obligation to provide financial statements. Not exactly sure what you're looking for here in terms of proof. We will be...

Furthermore, Your Honour, the crossclaim will be filed prior to the end of discovery.