Search results

  1. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    This would be my new closing statement. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT This case rests on a question of legal interpretation: whether Part I §6(10) of the Criminal Code Act permits an individual to claim self-defense when the criminal action being...
  2. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    Your Honor, I mistakenly thought this was a Federal Case. Permission to amend closing statement to reflect District instead of Federal court?
  3. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT This case rests on a question of legal interpretation: whether Part I §6(10) of the Criminal Code Act permits an individual to claim self-defense when the criminal action being defended against is directed at another...
  4. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    Your Honor, I'm deeply sorry for pissing the deadline on this. I got the deadline of this case mixed up with another case. I am fully aware that the court may deny to let the Commonwealth post its closing statement. Regardless, I'm requesting a post-hoc extension for this deadline.
  5. E

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ToadKing_ [2026] FCR 34

    It has been nearly a month since this message. The Commonwealth respectfully inquires if this might be because of the former presiding judge of this case resigning, and if the process of finding a public defender is still ongoing.
  6. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Would it help if I identified the provision stating that the DHS can accept the dispute after evidence has been provided. (This is different from what the Plaintiff was asking, but it's the closest thing I can think of that I can do).
  7. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honor, are you requiring me to respond to question 2 as you sustained a non-responsive objection?
  8. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Response to objection I never states that I didn't say what the Plaintiff cited. I did in fact state "Hello, in order to accept your dispute, I'll need some proof of this being self defense." But as I said before, the Plaintiff is just completely twisting my statement. The Plaintiff claims that...
  9. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honor, respectfully, the reason I could not identify a provision that allowed me to make that statement that the Plaintiff claims, is because I never made that statement.
  10. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Answer to question 2 As I said. I never imposed the condition that the dispute must be accepted in order for the Plaintiff to be released. I said that I needed proof in order to accept the dispute, I never linked the acceptance of the dispute to the release of the Plaintiff. Thus, I cannot...
  11. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    The Commonwealth has no issue with this. I'd like to clarify that my question was just an inquiry and I did not mean any disrespect to Your Honor or the Court.
  12. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    Your Honor, is there a particular reason for skipping opening statements?
  13. E

    Lawsuit: In Session Monzter9697 v. misterY3597 [2026] DCR 65

    I unfortunately cannot continue to represent the Defendant in this case.
  14. E

    Lawsuit: Pending lnvlsbie v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 115

    I will continue to represent the Commonwealth in this case. I believe a new judge needs to be assigned to this case.
  15. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Wiitedo [2026] FCR 67

    Your Honor, is it at all possible that this case was overlooked by the court due to it being transferred twice?
  16. E

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. YoshiKarter [2026] SCR 17

    SENTENCING BRIEF The Defendant was charged with one count of Harassment of a Polling Place under Part II, §8 of the Criminal Code Act. After negotiations between the Commonwealth and the Defense, a plea deal was reached. Pursuant to that agreement, the Defendant has pleaded guilty. In...
  17. E

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. YoshiKarter [2026] SCR 17

    Your Honor, may I request a 24 hour extension? We recently had another leadership change and the DoJ has been very busy with cases lately.
  18. E

    Lawsuit: Dismissed waygooda v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 60

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defense moves to dismiss the case with prejudice pursuant to Court Rule 5.5, on the grounds that the Plaintiff has failed to produce any evidence supporting the claims in the Complaint. The Plaintiff alleges that they...
  19. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    RESPONSE I affirm that the use of my language was improper, but it wasn't directed at anyone. I apologize for my conduct. I do not believe there are any regulations that prevent a witness from objecting to questions that were asked. The reason for me objecting is that noone from the Department...
  20. E

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    I would like to clarify the court that I am not representing the Commonwealth in this case.
Back
Top