Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-013: Enhanced screenshots of the Plaintiff's farm — showing the full scale of the farming operation...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, P-012: Enhanced ticket screenshot with staff response. DATED: This 16th day of June, 2026

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-005 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-005. P-005 and P-006 are not duplicates — they capture two entirely distinct moments. P-005 shows the moment of impact — the Plaintiff...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Defendant claims the Plaintiff "simply chose" to stop fishing and that the Defendant's conduct had nothing to do with this decision. This is directly contradicted by the evidence on record. P-008 confirms...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-009 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-009. P-009 is a screenshot of a Discord support ticket opened by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is the author of the ticket and can...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-001 AND P-002 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-001 and P-002. P-001, P-002, and P-003 are not duplicates. Each screenshot captures a distinct moment in a continuous...

Your Honor, the Plaintiff notes that the Defendant has filed an Objection during the discovery period. Objections are not a recognised procedural step during discovery. If the Defendant wishes to challenge the admissibility of P-008, the appropriate mechanism is a Motion to Strike. The Plaintiff...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Plaintiff confirms the renaming of the playtime screenshot from P-005 to P-007 as suggested by the Defendant. This is noted for the record. The Plaintiff also wishes to clarify the nature of the Loss of...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-008: Discord screenshots from both Democracycraft and Multiman/Jada campaign discord confirming that...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS LIST Your Honor, Pursuant to Rule 4.9, the Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. MMiqa — The Plaintiff will testify regarding the two separate incidents on June 2, 2026: the initial invisible approach by the Defendant...

Your Honor, I apologize for the procedural error in my previous submissions. I will ensure my future filings adhere to the proper format.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — DEFENCE III — LOSS OF ENJOYMENT Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's claims in Defence III regarding Loss of Enjoyment on three grounds. First, Defence III(a) claims that loss of enjoyment does not appear after a...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — DEFENCE II — PUNITIVE DAMAGES Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's claim that punitive damages do not apply because the conduct was not outrageous. The Defendant's own Answer confirms the following: - The...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — DEFENCE I(b) — COUNT II — PROVOCATION Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's claim in Defence I(b) that Count II was provoked because "the defendant attacked him earlier." The Defendant's own Answer at Point 8...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — DEFENCE I(a) — COUNT I — LACK OF CLAIM Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's claim in Defence I(a) that "since the Defendant did not hit the Plaintiff, a valid basis for Assault does not exist" and that "there was...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — LACK OF EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's claim in Defence III(b) that "since the incident, the Plaintiff has played for over 48 hours, giving no signs of loss of enjoyment." The Defendant has...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — PLAINTIFF Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-007: Playtime records via /about MMiqa — directly rebutting the Defendant's unsubstantiated claim that the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MMiqa Plaintiff v. ZachOfPotatoes10 Defendant COMPLAINT WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF On June 2, 2026, the Plaintiff had been a member of the Commonwealth of Redmont for approximately one day, having accumulated only...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS LIST Your Honor, Pursuant to Rule 4.9, the Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. MMiqa — The Plaintiff will testify regarding the three consecutive unprovoked wrongful deaths in Aventura on June 2, 2026, their status as a...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION DCR 67%27'](Objection) — P-005 Your Honor, The Plaintiff does not oppose the Defendant's objection to P-005. P-005 is not material to the Plaintiff's claims for relief and may be disregarded by the Court. The...