Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Robbe Haegi's objection addresses Questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 but does not provide substantive answers to any of them. Robbe Haegi instead challenges the framing of the questions and...
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION — COUNSEL IS TESTIFYING / ASKED AND ANSWERED Your Honour, I. Counsel is Testifying The Plaintiff's questions reference §6(b) and DHS's own interrogatory response, both of which are established parts of the record...
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 2 asked Robbe Haegi to identify the specific provision of the Criminal Code Act, the Executive Standards Act, or any other statute or DHS policy document that authorised the statement made at...
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following questions for witnesses: I. MMiqa — Narrative On June 12, 2026, I was arrested and charged with Mass Murder x7. Upon arrest, DHS Recruit CreeperTD directed me to open a DHS...
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    @Dartanboy Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully wishes to draw the Court's attention to the pending the Public Defender Program has failed the 10 day deadline. It has been 18 days since it was in place. We understand that there is a workload in the DoJ, for that reason the Plaintiff...
  6. MMiqa

    Election Council Elections - JULY 2026 (Special #1)

    I, MMiqa, declare that I will be contesting a seat on the Council of Oakridge as an Independent.
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending RemyTheRatta v. Bernerd_madoff [2026] DCR 134

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION RemyTheRatta (represented by SingeHeart, Addams & Associates) Plaintiff v. Bernerd_madoff Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES RemyTheRatta (Plaintiff), a...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    @Dogeington Your Honor, It has been 8 days since all parties confirmed their presence in response to the Writ of Summons. Respectfully requesting the Court's guidance on how it wishes to proceed at this stage. MMiqa Plaintiff
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff rejects the settlement offer made by Attorney General Juniperfig. Respectfully submitted, MMiqa
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that the issue in this case is not the adequacy of the Defendant’s counsel. The Defendant, rykazard, has been inactive and unresponsive throughout these proceedings — failing to submit an opening statement, failing to respond to witness questions...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    @Kaiserin_ Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully wishes to draw the Court's attention to the pending Motion for Default Judgment filed at Post #48. The 24-hour deadline granted to witness rykazard at Post #46 has now passed. The Plaintiff respectfully awaits the Court's ruling at the Court's...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Your Honour @Kaiserin_ , The Plaintiff respectfully moves for Default Judgment against the Defendant. The Defendant has failed to participate in this proceeding at three separate stages: Failed to submit an...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that witness rykazard has failed to respond to the submitted questions within the 24-hour period granted by the Court at Post #46. The Plaintiff respectfully moves for Default Judgment against the Defendant. The Defendant has now failed to...
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS QUESTIONS — rykazard Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following questions to witness rykazard: 1. On June 2, 2026, at approximately 02:36 AM in-game time, you were present in Aventura while rendered invisible and wielding a...
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS QUESTIONS — MMiqa Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following questions to witness MMiqa: Q1 - On June 2, 2026, what were you doing in Aventura at approximately 02:36 AM in-game time? A1 - I was fishing on Aventura Docks...
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, This case does not require the Court to weigh competing accounts. The Defendant's own filings establish every material fact necessary for judgment in the Plaintiff's favour. I. THE LAW Criminal Code Act §6(b)...
  17. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully requests permission to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and submits the following should the Court grant such permission. Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 6 states: "A Motion to Dismiss must be submitted at any time before the beginning of...
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    @Kaiserin_ Your Honour, I would like to respectfully state that The Defendant have failed to submit an opening statement in time. Their motion to dismiss could not be an excuse to that, since it should be submitted before opening statements started.
Back
Top