Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Objection - Breach of Procedure Dear Judge @Muggy21 Attorney General @Matthew100x , this is the second time today state prosecutor and witness Ebborsnam is harrassing me in my lawsuits. I wish to see Court not leave these actions go unpunished.
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Motion To Nolle Prosequi The Plaintiff wishes to dismiss the case with prejudice
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Notice to Court, The mistake I made is framed as misuse of AI, where a problem with the amended law I have done is being framed as "Misuse of AI" since I use AI drafting tool and it is public knowledge, the Court is trying to frame every mistake I made as Misuse of AI. The opposing counsel...
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Ah, I meant 9.1, I double checked here, I made a mistake for thinking it was 9.2, it is a typo in my hand. I wish to fix it Your Honour if I have your permission
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Dear representative, I did not officially gave a response, I could not ignore it completely, I thought that would be disrespectful.
  6. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72

    Notice, I wish to correct, State Prosecutor, not representative, since he was not representing the State here, but he acted like he was in the MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77 up until he realized his mistake, I wished to clearify.
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72

    OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure Ebborsnam, since %20DCR%2077']MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77, has acted like a representative when he was not, showing lack of respect to Court despite being State Representative, as shown in Post 54, Post 58, and in Post 59, confirming he...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MMiqa Plaintiff v. Bar Association of Redmont Defendant AMENDED COMPLAINT WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF On August 5, 2026, the Bar Association of Redmont Council passed a Motion to Censure the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff...
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72

    Notice Ebborsnam is correct, I will be amending it again. For the record, I have done the edit one minute after and before anyone replied to. Another thing, Ebborsnam is not representing the BAR I believe, so this is the third time this week he has done objections, while not being an attorney...
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont [2026] FCR 72

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MMiqa Plaintiff v. Bar Association of Redmont Defendant AMENDED COMPLAINT WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF On August 5, 2026, the Bar Association of Redmont Council passed a Motion to Censure the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Notice to Court, I have always stayed open in my AI usage in my drafts, but never to generate ideas, claims, proof, or any other fabrication. The evidence given is not sufficient, thats why the Court Order did not punish me for misuse of AI, The Defendant need to read the court order correctly...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Response to objection I have filed a motion to recuse, and after the court order of ko531. I am sick of hearing reliance of AI, do you have any proof of that except the date issue and a human mistake I made, used a law that did not exist anymore? I filed for motion to reconsider for ko531's...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Reply to Objection I have filed a motion to reconsider for the Judge ko531.
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, In order the clear the confusion if there is one, The Plaintiff is asking for an answer from Judge @ko531 for his Motion first before dismissal.
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully moves to voluntarily dismiss this case without prejudice. The Plaintiff has faced significant procedural irregularities throughout these proceedings — including a contempt finding issued without prior warning in violation of Court Rules, and an unequal...
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER — CONTEMPT FINDING AND CONDUCT STRIKE Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully moves for reconsideration of the contempt finding and conduct strike on the following grounds. I. THE COURT ITSELF CONFIRMED AI USE IS NOT...
  17. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    I want to be plain and simple here Your Honour, did you, or did you not use LLM's in your court order?
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    I am sorry, but do you have evidence that I used completely AI and not have done my research and gave points, and not gone through the evidences and the case myself? Do you have any proof of that aside from the usage of english?
  19. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    The usage of AI, where I gave wrong and fabricated hallucinations? Your point was how it used english, thats it. I used repealed or amended, which is true, and how the sentences were formed, this is the hallucinations? Respectfully, I will be pursuing to appeal it if this is not corrected. I...
  20. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, I wish to know what I did was interfering with administration of justice, since usage of AI done by me was not the case, as you stated here,
Back
Top