Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT — PLAINTIFF MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69 Your Honor, This case is straightforward. The Defendant's own Answer establishes every material fact necessary for judgment in the Plaintiff's favour. What remains in...
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT (Pursuant to Court Rule 3.3) Your Honour, The Plaintiff amends the Complaint as follows: I. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF — AMENDED Claim II is added under RCCA Part XI §3 — Misfeasance in Public Office, which provides: "A...
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-013: In-game screenshot dated June 12, 2026, showing in local chat: "Mass Murder x7. You have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used...
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION (Pursuant to Court Rule 4.6) Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-011: In-game screenshot dated June 13, 2026, at approximately 00:01, showing the Plaintiff actively present in game while...
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO IMPROPER EVIDENCE OBJECTION Your Honour, I. The Defendant directed the Plaintiff to produce chat logs In Ticket #32935, DHS officer darklordrobber stated: "you can search your minecraft chat logs for the messages saying you can...
  6. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Interrogatory 1 asked: "At what point were Robbe Haegi and Vuda Sage respectively aware of the Plaintiff's self-defence claim under §6(b) of the Criminal Code Act?" The phrase "at what point"...
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-010: In-game chat logs dated June 12, 2026, showing the Plaintiff logging into the server at 23:45:30 and actively present in-game at 23:57:54 and 23:58:23...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-008: In-game chat log dated June 12, 2026, at 21:45:50, showing DHS Recruit CreeperTD directing the Plaintiff to open a DHS support ticket under #support...
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS LIST (Pursuant to Court Rule 4.9) Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. MMiqa — The Plaintiff will testify regarding the repeated and explicit invocations of §6(b) during imprisonment, DHS's repeated...
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories to the Defendant: Interrogatory 1: At what point were Robbe Haegi and Vuda Sage respectively aware of the Plaintiff's self-defence claim under...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER Your Honour, Pursuant to the Court's order, the Plaintiff provides the following direct answer to the Defendant's third interrogatory: Interrogatory 3: What is the difference between the words "submission" and...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION (Pursuant to Court Rule 4.6) Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-007: Full transcript of Ticket #32935, submitted pursuant to the Court's order on the Defendant's Motion to Compel. The...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS Your Honour, I. Response to Perjury/Non-Responsive Objection There is no contradiction and no perjury. The Plaintiff's statements are entirely consistent. The Complaint states Vuda Sage was "typing and deleting...
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES Your Honour, The Plaintiff responds to the Defendant's interrogatories as follows: Interrogatory 1: Where does the "management time zones" explanation appear? The "management time zones" explanation was made by...
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion to Compel in its entirety. I. Ticket #32935 is in Defendant's own possession Ticket #32935 is a Department of Homeland Security support...
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, The Plaintiff does not contest the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with respect to the first prayer for relief. The Plaintiff accepts that nominal damages are not available where other damages are...
  17. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND EVIDENCE CAPTION — P-002 Your Honor, The Plaintiff moves to amend the caption of P-002 to accurately reflect its contents. Current caption: "Screenshot showing the Defendant rykazard has initiated a fight ('rykazard has...
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits the following additional evidence pursuant to Rule 4.2: P-013: Enhanced screenshots of the Plaintiff's farm — showing the full scale of the farming operation...
  19. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY SUBMISSION — ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Your Honor, P-012: Enhanced ticket screenshot with staff response. DATED: This 16th day of June, 2026
  20. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE — P-005 Your Honor, The Plaintiff opposes the Defendant's Motion to Strike P-005. P-005 and P-006 are not duplicates — they capture two entirely distinct moments. P-005 shows the moment of impact — the Plaintiff...
Back
Top