Search results

  1. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Pending MMiqa v. Bar Association of Redmont

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MMiqa Plaintiff v. Bar Association of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF On August 5, 2026, the Bar Association of Redmont Council passed a Motion to Censure the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff brings...
  2. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour @Superwoops, The Plaintiff respectfully but firmly submits that the contempt finding and conduct strike must be set aside immediately. The grounds are unambiguous. I. THE CONTEMPT FINDING VIOLATES COURT RULES — NO WARNING WAS GIVEN FOR AI USE Court Rules and Procedures state...
  3. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff sincerely apologises for the out of turn statement and will ensure this does not happen again. The Plaintiff respectfully requests permission to respond to the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. MMiqa Plaintiff, Self-Represented
  4. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Pursuant to Court Rule 9.2) Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court for summary judgment on both claims and on the request for punitive damages. Rule 9.2 provides that where the Court has fully...
  5. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    May I respond, Your Honor?
  6. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully requests permission to respond to the Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. The Plaintiff has already submitted a response — if the Court requires formal permission first, the Plaintiff apologises for the procedural error and asks that the...
  7. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. I. THE CITED PRECEDENTS DO NOT APPLY TO THIS CASE AND ARE NOT BINDING The Defendant...
  8. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    Your Honor, I did not mean to disrespect, I just wanted to point out that this was happening for the second time.
  9. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT NOTICE TO COURT Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to two matters arising from Robbe Haegi's most recent filing. First, regarding procedure: this Court has already ruled that a witness may not challenge...
  10. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — PERJURY Your Honour, Robbe Haegi has now stated before this Court on multiple occasions that they never made the statement cited by the Plaintiff. This is the second time Robbe Haegi has made this denial in these proceedings...
  11. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that under Court Rules and Procedures, a party may respond to an objection within 24 hours of it being filed. The Plaintiff is exercising that right. The Defendant's...
  12. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 2 asked Robbe Haegi to identify the specific provision of the Criminal Code Act, the Executive Standards Act, or any other statute or DHS policy document that authorised the statement made at...
  13. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO ALL PENDING FILINGS Your Honour, Before responding to the pending filings, the Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to the following: The Defendant, rykazard, has failed to participate in these proceedings at...
  14. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully notes that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is procedurally improper. Court Rules require that a Motion to Dismiss be submitted before the beginning of opening statements. The Plaintiff's opening statement was filed. This Motion was filed — well after...
  15. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    @Muggy21 Your Honor, The Plaintiff would like to respectfully point out that @Vudaaa has failed to respond in time.
  16. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, The Plaintiff acknowledges Robbe Haegi's apology and considers the matter of decorum closed. On the question of witness objections, the Plaintiff defers to the Court's judgment on whether a witness has standing to lodge...
  17. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully draws the Court's attention to two matters arising from Robbe Haegi's most recent filing. First, Robbe Haegi has confirmed that they are not representing the Commonwealth in this case. As a witness...
  18. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Robbe Haegi's objection addresses Questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 but does not provide substantive answers to any of them. Robbe Haegi instead challenges the framing of the questions and...
  19. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION — COUNSEL IS TESTIFYING / ASKED AND ANSWERED Your Honour, I. Counsel is Testifying The Plaintiff's questions reference §6(b) and DHS's own interrogatory response, both of which are established parts of the record...
  20. MMiqa

    Lawsuit: In Session MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION — NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 2 asked Robbe Haegi to identify the specific provision of the Criminal Code Act, the Executive Standards Act, or any other statute or DHS policy document that authorised the statement made at...
Back
Top