IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Yeet_Boy
Plaintiff
v.
Town of Oakridge and Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant(s)
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM, that on May 15, 2026 at 4:00pm, the Department of State opened declarations for the May 2026 Oakridge...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your Honour,
This case’s value is blown out of proportion by Plaintiff and his alleged injury is greatly inflated.
I. Punitive Damages Are Unwarranted
A. Issue
The issue is whether Defendant’s conduct satisfies the...
Your Honour,
I sincerely apologize for this, but I would like a final 12 hour extension on the opening on top of the 12 hours already requested, so in total a 24 hour extension. The opening statement has taken longer than anticipated and I hope to take a better look at it in the morning rather...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
IMPROPER EVIDENCE
Your Honour,
Plaintiff submitted P-010, which is an editable text log file.
The Courts have upheld that, unless the editable text logs are corroborated by a secondary source, they are inadmissable (See Commonwealth of...
1. Robbe Haegi became aware of the Plaintiff's self-defense claim when they first reviewed and responded to the ticket. Vuda was made aware of the Plaintiff's claim for dispute once he had a moment to review the ticket, shortly after his first message in it.
2. DHS's internal procedure upon...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PERJURY, NON-RESPONSIVE
Your Honour,
Plaintiff states in his response to our second interrogatory the following:
Meanwhile, the original complaint contains this following fact:
Plaintiff himself states that Defendant was typing and...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
Your Honour,
Defendant moves to compel Plaintiff to produce the following:
1. The entire ticket shown partially in P-001 to P-006; and
2. Any and all conversations between Plaintiff and Defendant pertaining to this case...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
MMiqa
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Homeland Security
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM, that on June 12, 2026, the Plaintiff was arrested and imprisoned by the Department of Homeland Security.
2. AFFIRM, that...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
Your Honour,
Defendant moves to dismiss the first prayer for relief under Rule 5.5 of the Court Rules & Procedures, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
I. Nominal Damages may only be awarded without any other...
Your Honour,
I'm withdrawing as counsel for the Co-Defendant. I'm unsure of whom to call to represent it in my place, as the party has deregistered itself.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.