Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 3mkTalal v. FamousWiseTiger [2026] DCR 47

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order of Dismissal - 3mkTalal v. FamousWiseTiger [2026] DCR 47 The Plaintiff sued for nominal damages arising from an alleged attempted murder. But nominal damages are not a freestanding claim. They presuppose an established cause of action...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: In Session ko531 v. Incarnation__ & Jakkuwu_ et. al [2026] FCR 47

    Granted, lets do a status check on July 6th, 2026.
  3. M

    Appeal: Accepted Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59

    DENIED. As the reviewing court, I'm required to do as the motion states. In order for an argument to be heard on appeal, it must be included in the trial court record. If such arguments are not present, they will be disregarded.
  4. M

    Appeal: Accepted Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59

    The Court grants the additional six hours. If you can't do it, no need to update the Court.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    Named defendants, the bank is not entitled to public defense.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    No, I accidentally lumped in your client in this Court's original EI decision when relaying the instruction to the DHS. She will be refunded fully. DHS has images of everything seized and the we'll endeavour to ensure she's made whole. Again, sorry about that.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Aventura [2026] FCR 44

    For example, DHS can fine someone for advertising in #economics or #legal on the main discord. That's generally accepted practice, the question follows the same line of logic for town discords.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Etco v. mvchrelle [2026] DCR 102

    The action is dismissed for want of prosecution. GRANTED.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 3mkTalal v. FamousWiseTiger [2026] DCR 47

    ^ Dont know why I re-opened discovery after, anyways.. Reviewing the motion, I'll rule on this shortly.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Aventura [2026] FCR 44

    This Court's OSC to the Commonwealth is recalled, the Court believes that the Commonwealth has some standing in this case. That being said, I'd need additional briefing to achieve that. The Motion to Dismiss is denied. The constitutionality of the law in question is outstanding and the...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. schmuck [2026] FCR 58

    This action will dismissed on July 1st, 2026 @ 9pm EDT for want of prosecution if a Complaint isn't filed.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    Parties have failed to appear, a Public Defender will be called.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 39

    We're proceeding with an forums trial. @ko531 You have until 7/3/26 @ 9pm EDT to respond. If unavailable, then 7/5/26 @ 9pm EDT is automatically granted as an extension.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SCRGabriele180 v. vircento [2026] DCR 104

    Under what section of the Redmont Civil Code Act, or alternatively our common law, do you rely on for your claims. You have 48 hours.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Slime_Mario v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 92

    I'm assuming you've told the DoJ and a replacement is being secured?
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. schmuck [2026] FCR 58

    DENIED. This is duplicative of an order of this Court recently filed: In re: PC&B, Operator (Asset Seizure) [2026] FCR E005 IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Asset Seizure Warrant/Order Upon the application of the Department of Commerce pursuant to the Financial Institutions...
  17. M

    Appeal: Accepted Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59

    Granted submit prior to 7/1/26 @ 9pm EDT @mortishuh You have until 7/1/26 @ 9pm EDT to submit a Response IF YOU SO WISH.
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Fukunishiki v .CrownedWitness [2026] DCR 108

    This isn’t an emergency injunction request, denied.
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Fukunishiki v .CrownedWitness [2026] DCR 108

    Granted with a modification. 1) The DHS shall seize the 10 stacks of diamonds in question. In the alternative, DHS shall seize $1800 for safekeeping.
Back
Top