Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed HarryVInnit v. .Farmerkalechip and the Department of Justice

    Moved to the District Court due to prayers requested
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed totemundying v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 122

    "2. Removing the false charge off my police record" This makes it an appeal of a criminal charge.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Bankruptcy Petition - Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, Debtor [2026] FCR XXX.

    The case is frozen, this won't be reconsidered. Staff needs to advise that they're completed with their investigation. That's all.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Bankruptcy Petition - Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, Debtor [2026] FCR XXX.

    While we're discussing a case in a docket thread, I'm a judicial officer. I opened a ticket with Staff to inquire as to the state of their investigation. An admin then advised me that they're still investigating. Since they're still investigating, this case is frozen. See this case where...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed totemundying v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 122

    This is a pseudo-appeal of a criminal charge and a tort action against the Commonwealth. What authority in the RCCA do you rely on for your claims? If not in the RCCA, then where? You have 48 Hours to respond.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. YoshiKarter [2026] SCR 17

    The action was removed to the Supreme Court. I will be the presiding officer. @YoshiKarter is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Yoshikarter [2026] SCR 17
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Bankruptcy Petition - Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, Debtor [2026] FCR XXX.

    Staff continues to investigate the incident regarding DNB. The case is frozen pending advisement from the Staff Team.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: In Session Singeheart, Addams and Associates V hadethegod, Wallavan Donovan, HL-Bank [2026] DCR 68

    @Matthew100x The Federal Court has accepted and issued a verdict on appeal. <Appeal: Accepted - Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59> 1) The dismissal with prejudice decision is void. 2) The order for legal fees as awarded in the June 19th verdict is void. As clerk I've modified the...
  9. M

    Appeal: Accepted Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Memorandum, Decision, and Order - Appeal in re: [2026] DCR 68 | [2026] FCR 59 Appellant approaches the Federal Court seeking relief from the District Court's dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint under Rule 5.5 and for relief from awarded...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Slime_Mario v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 92

    Granted. July 11th, 2026 at 9pm EDT.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    @MJL @DaanBanaan5673 Either clarify your complaints (if applicable) or respond to the objection.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    Understood, the Court will secure a public defender for the defendant.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. schmuck [2026] FCR 58

    Discovery is now open until July 13th, 2026 at 9pm EDT. Classified or evidence that should otherwise remain out of the public view shall be posted in our sidebar.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Town of Aventura [2026] FCR 44

    Declined, you don't have the right qualifications (Constitutional) to be heard.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Sujal1048J et al v. Goldman Capital

    The Federal Court is receipt of this Complaint and will discuss how to proceed.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

    @Kvalej is ordered to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Desertstorm49 et al v. Marseywpd [2026] FCR 55 DENIED, the Court has been under a tremendous workload and intentionally hasn't requested an Answer from Defense. @gribble19 Unless the additional defendant appears with...
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Wiitedo

    Overlooked the fine part, welcome back to the Federal Court.
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Wiitedo

    The Federal Court removes the action to the District Court. The Federal Court has jurisdiction in prosecutions that will result in jail EXCEEDING 60 minutes.
Back
Top