Recent content by ultrapvpnoob

  1. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lex404 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] DCR 57

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, Our client was wrongfully convicted for murder 27 times and spent over 4 hours in jail. That is 4 hours they could have spent enjoying Redmont, making money, or any other number of activities. This experience...
  2. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Duckiiiiiiii v. MysticPhunky [2024] FCR 7

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Duckiiiiiiii (Lovely Law Representing) Plaintiff v. MysticPhunky Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The defendant requested of the plaintiff to be killed by them. The plaintiff...
  3. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lex404 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] DCR 57

    Your honor, the plaintiff would like to submit these pieces of evidence
  4. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Dubiousbird vs modzy_ [2023] FCR 110

    The parties have reached an agreement out of court. We would like to request this case be dismissed
  5. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Dubiousbird vs modzy_ [2023] FCR 110

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION DubiousBird (Lovely representing) (Plaintiff) V modzy_ (Defendants) COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: Two of the plaintiff’s employees were terrorized while building their bar...
  6. ultrapvpnoob

    Expungement: Denied Ultrapvpnoob - [2023] FCR 21 Expungement Request

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EXPUNGEMENT REQUEST The petitioner seeks to have their criminal record removed, in accordance with the Expungement Act. They understand that expungement is only possible if it has been at least 2 months since they have been charged, and that the...
  7. ultrapvpnoob

    Bill Nye, the...

    ayo
  8. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Dygyee [2022] SCR 22

    Your Honor, I will be taking over this case on behalf of Gertis until he is back.
  9. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Good afternoon, your Honor, opposing counsel, My client has attempted to commit election fraud. He attempted to give money to people to vote for him. He is incredibly incompetent, however. He failed miserably at this goal...
  10. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    We do not agree with the plea deal and will be posting our closing statement shortly.
  11. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    Response to objection: The prosecution was the one that brought up bribery, and we are defending against that. Nowhere else is bribery legally defined in the Redmont law, and internet dictionary usage does not matter when talking about the law. Only legal definitions matter when talking about law.
  12. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, to quote the prosecution: "In the White-Collar Crack Down Act, bribery is defined as 'the act of offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving an item or service of value to influence an individual holding public...
  13. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. lawanoesepr Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM that lawanoesepr offered money for people to vote for him 2. DO NOT AFFIRM that the defendant's actions...
  14. ultrapvpnoob

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lawanoesepr [2022] FCR 95

    Your honor, my client has spoken out of line and I request that he be charged with contempt of court and his statement stricken from the record as he agreed to be represented by a public defender, and is therefore not allowed to interject into proceedings
Back
Top