Recent content by ultrapvpnoob

  1. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, the witness answered the question to their capacity, and provided any additional insights that might've been useful for clearing up any doubts. The witness's statements should stand
  2. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    To AngryHamdog: 1.Under the law and DHS policy, are DHS employees allowed to arrest someone without the reason for the arrest being a specific crime. By 'reason for the arrest' I am referring to the particular reason that officer chose to use the handcuffs on the player. 2. Is "pandemic starting...
  3. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    To Talion77: 1. Describe what you saw regarding lawanoesepr on the day of the arrest To Masked3D_Wolf: 1. What history do you have working in the DHS? 2. Have you ever been involved in a scenario where you had to arrest a disease spreader during your time in the department? If so, please...
  4. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    Your honor, we would like to request a 24 hour extension.
  5. U

    Blind Typing!

    MgChamp
  6. U

    Blind Typing!

    Plurauw
  7. U

    Blind Typing!

    enigma.}++#
  8. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, One of the fundamental rights that all humans have is the right to liberty. This right can only be taken away under strict circumstances, such as committing a crime. When a police officer, the head of the...
  9. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, Even if the defense argues that legal fees should not be included in the sum of damages, this case deals with questions of constitutionality. According to the constitution, the‌ ‌Federal ‌Court‌...
  10. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, If you add up all of the prayer for relief in the original complaint, you get (15000+15000+1750+7500)*(130%)=$51,025, which is more than the $50,000 jurisdiction of the District Court. As it is a...
  11. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    May we respond to the motion to dismiss, your Honour?
  12. U

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION lawanoesepr (Represented by Justita Legal Group) Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Plaintiff, lawanoesepr, brings this case against the...
  13. U

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Lex404 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] DCR 57

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, Our client was wrongfully convicted for murder 27 times and spent over 4 hours in jail. That is 4 hours they could have spent enjoying Redmont, making money, or any other number of activities. This experience...
Back
Top